<?xml version="1.0" ?> 
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>

<title>Atheist on the Blog - Nick Gisburne</title>
<description>Atheist on the Blog - Nick Gisburne</description>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/ngblog.php</link>
<language>en</language>



<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 71-75</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-10-08a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 

It's only a few days since I gave you the last batch of samples from Blasphemy! The Musical, but I seem to have stepped up a gear this week and have had a couple of days in which I wrote two songs instead of one. So here are the latest five:





Y... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<img src="http://www.gisburne.com/pix/promo03.gif" align=right style="margin:0 0 12px 12px;">
It's only a few days since I gave you the last batch of samples from <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>, but I seem to have stepped up a gear this week and have had a couple of days in which I wrote two songs instead of one. So here are the latest five:


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Your Faith Is My Hell</B><BR>
<I>I Know Him So Well</I> (Chess)
<BR>
<BR>Hell is just a myth, no more than fantasy
<BR>Though you think it's where my soul belongs
<BR>You say its lake of flames will torture me
<BR>But you can't admit you may be wrong
<BR>...
<BR>Until you start to see
<BR>Religion is empty of truth and honesty
<BR>(Its lies you hide but still I see them)
<BR>Your faith is my Hell


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Kosher Bacon Pies</B><BR>
<I>Smoke Gets In Your Eyes</I> (Roberta)
<BR>
<BR>When Torah laws confine
<BR>These will blow your mind
<BR>Take them home and try
<BR>At a bargain price
<BR>Kosher Bacon Pies


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>In Heaven Life Is Lame</B><BR>
<I>I'm Gonna File My Claim</I> (River Of No Return)
<BR>
<BR>The afterlife with Jesus is no fun at all
<BR>Each day up there is always the same
<BR>A billion years of boredom with no alcohol
<BR>In Heaven life is lame
<BR>
<BR>The place is full of people who all kiss God's ass
<BR>They praise and sing and worship his name
<BR>Eternity with them I'd really rather pass
<BR>In Heaven life is lame


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Those Old Fat Catholics</B><BR>
<I>That Old Black Magic</I> (The Nutty Professor)
<BR>
<BR>Those old fat Catholics keep their secrets well
<BR>Those old fat Catholics warn kids not to tell
<BR>They let them sip on the communion wine
<BR>They love to touch them on their young behinds


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Thorn Crown, Loin Cloth And Nails</B><BR>
<I>Top Hat, White Tie And Tails</I> (Top Hat)
<BR>
<BR>What to wear for crucifixion in Israel?
<BR>The Romans
<BR>Suggested
<BR>For Jesus
<BR>The normal
<BR>Thorn crown, loin cloth and nails
<BR>...
<BR>So I'm pushing on the thorn crown
<BR>Tightening the loin cloth
<BR>Hammering the nails


<P><hr size=1><P>


I was particularly pleased to add Judaism to the list of religions I've blasphemed against. Yes, Jews have had a hard time in the past (in fact for most of recorded history really), but come on... you don't eat <I>bacon</I>? How could anyone believe that God doesn't want you to eat bacon?! If anything, he would probably make it mandatory! Yum!
<P>
So another landmark has been passed - 75 songs is three quarters of the way there. There are only 25 to go now, and after some editing the book will be available. Keep watching!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Church of England vicar calls for gay men to be tattooed</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-10-06b</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
The Reverend Peter Mullen, a minor member of the English clergy has been caught writing anti-gay hate speech. In a blog. On the Internet. Pete... mate... did you think nobody would find it? First, links to reports of the story itself:

The Guardian ... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
The Reverend Peter Mullen, a minor member of the English clergy has been caught writing anti-gay hate speech. In a blog. On the Internet. Pete... mate... did you think nobody would find it? First, links to reports of the story itself:
<P>
<A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/06/religion"><B>The Guardian</B></A> - Vicar could be disciplined for blog slurs against gays and Muslims
<P>
<A HREF="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/3145269/Homosexuals-should-carry-warning-tattoos-says-chaplain.html"><B>The Telegraph</B></A> - Homosexuals should carry warning tattoos, says chaplain
<P>
<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7655585.stm"><B>BBC New Channel</B></A> - Tattoo gay people, priest writes


<hr size=1>
Although the vicar's blog has been removed, some quick detective work revealed his original post, courtesy of Google cache:
<blockquote>
Matthew Parris is wilfully refusing to give his readers his opinion about the recent "gay wedding" and about relationships between the church and homosexuals generally. He says, "When it comes to the church, synagogue or mosque, if you think the whole thing ridiculous, its hard to get excited about the ridiculousness of a subset of it. I should feel the same if morris dancers or the British Astrological Society tried to exclude gays."
<P>
So, for Parris, the views of billions of Christians, Jews and Muslims worldwide are of no more consequence than a couple of obscure sectional interests. From what point of privileged judgement does he thus discount 4000 years of civilisation? The great world religions have survived the criticisms of far more intelligent and better informed opponents than the ignorant upstart Parris. There is a whole history and literature of distinguished apologetics for religious belief, but Parris will attend to none of it - sufficient only to attract his disdain is mainstream religion's disapproval of homosexual acts.
<P>
Since Parris will not dirty his hands by entering theological discussions with his readers, perhaps I might answer for religious believers in the purely utilitarian terms which even the lofty Parris is bound to engage with. We disapprove of homosexuality because it is clearly unnatural, a perversion and corruption of natural instincts and affections, and because it is a cause of fatal disease. The AIDS pandemic was originally caused by promiscuous homosexual behaviour. Such promiscuity is itself an evil because its perpetrators merely use others indiscriminately for their own gratification, treating their fellows as sex objects and as means to an end rather than as ends in themselves. I should have thought that Parris, having rejected religious belief, might want to construct his moral beliefs on this Kantian humanistic imperative. But I suspect he is not really interested in morality of any kind - except as a special plea to excuse his lust for gratification at whatever cost to human dignity and the sanctity of human life.
<P>
It is time that religious believers began to recommend specific utilitarian discouragements of homosexual practices after the style of warnings on cigarette packets: Let us make it obligatory for homosexuals to have their backsides tattooed with the slogan SODOMY CAN SERIOUSLY DAMAGE YOUR HEALTH and their chins with FELLATIO KILLS. In addition the obscene "gay pride" parades and carnivals should be banned for they give rise to passive corruption, comparable to passive smoking. Young people forced to witness these excrescences are corrupted by them.
<P>
Let me continue the comparison with smoking which is banned in most public places. Those committing homosexual acts in public places - such behaviour being a crime in any case under the Homosexual Reform Act of 1967 - should be arrested, tried and punished. Parks, open spaces and public lavatories would at once become more wholesome places. There ought to be teaching films shown in sex education classes in all our schools. These would portray acts of sodomy and the soundtrack would reinforce the message that it is a filthy practice ending with the admonition: "We do, after all, know the importance of washing our hands after going to the lavatory."
<P>
But I should like to turn Parris' disdain for religion back on to him. If I consider that homosexual practices are vile, why should I concern myself with subsets of their aspects? I might as well concern myself with other minor irrelevancies such as the Doris Day fanclub and polo-neck sweaters
</blockquote>
<P>
There was also an earlier blog which is equally anti-gay:
<blockquote>
<B>Gay wedding at St Bartholomew's EC1</B>
<BR>The Bishop of London is in a high huff
<BR>Because Dr Dudley has married a puff;
<BR>And not just one puff - he's married another:
<BR>Two priests, two puffs and either to other.
<BR>"It isn't a wedding, for that's not allowed;
<BR>They've just come together and promised and vowed
<BR>To shack up and snug up, to have and to hold:
<BR>Ooh aren't we radical! Ooh aren't we bold!"
<BR>Now here's a most queer and most wonderful thing:
<BR>He's given his hand, he's offered his ring;
<BR>And each to the other forever will bend,
<BR>After their troll in the coach up West End.
<BR>Not a flash wedding, no pics in Hello!
<BR>Just a honeymoon cottage, convenient so.
<BR>Of such Dr Dudley a goldmine has found,
<BR>From shaven-head puftas the nuptial pink pound.
<BR>The new Church of England embraces diversity,
<BR>A fresh modulation on ancient perversity:
<BR>"I'm C of E and PC so don't think it odd of me
<BR>To offer a licence and blessing for sodomy."
</blockquote>

And remember that the man who wrote this says, 'I wrote some satirical things on my blog and anybody with an ounce of sense of humour or any understanding of the tradition of English satire would immediately assume that they're light-hearted jokes.' Read the whole thing. Does it sound like a joke to you? No, I thought not.
<P>
<B>Hypocrisy?</B><BR>
However despicable you may think this man is, it's important to point out that his comments about Muslims (read the Guardian story, above) <I>are</I> justified:
<blockquote>
Mullen criticised the lack of jokes about Islam in the media, remarking that adherents "certainly lend themselves to ridicule: sticking their arses in the air five times a day. How about a few little choruses, 'Randy Muslims when they die/Find 70 virgins in the sky'?"
</blockquote>
<P>
Does that show hypocrisy on my part? No. here's why his anti-gay comments are not okay, but his anti-Muslim ones are:
<UL>
<LI>His anti-gay sentiments reflect an antipathy to a lifestyle which harms nobody. Gay people have gay sex and live their lives entirely consensually. They do not coerce anyone to be as they are, to do what they do. Homosexuality is not about changing you or I, it's not about forcing us to be gay. Being anti-gay means being against something for no other reason than 'you don't like it'. Or of course 'because God says so'.
<P>
<LI>Anti-Muslim sentiments are different. Islam most certainly <I>is</I> something which wants to change you and I. If you tell a joke about Islam on TV, expect hordes of angry, and sometimes downright dangerous, Muslims to beat down the door of the TV station. Islam allows no criticism without the risk of severe, violent consequences. Islam wants <I>me</I> to go along with its rules. It does not want Muslims to 'do their thing' in privacy, but instead seeks to impose its rules on everyone else. Being anti-Muslim is being anti-oppression.
</UL>
Criticism of gays is an attempt to stop gay people doing something they enjoy (being gay). That is wrong.
<P>
Islam <I>already</I> tries to stop people, including non-Muslims, doing certain things and enjoying certain freedoms. Speaking against Islam is therefore exactly the same as speaking against homophobia. Islam is in effect 'anti-everyone-else' (call it kafirophobia is you will - <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kafir"><B>kafir</B></A> is derogatory term for a non-Muslim). If it were not, I would not oppose its teachings and customs. Since it is, I do, and similarly oppose anti-gay sentiments such as thouse espoused by Rev Peter Mullen.
<P>
If gay people insisted that I be gay, told me that my hetero ways were abhorrent, and threw bricks at my house if I made jokes about them, I would oppose them. I would still defend their right to be gay, but would be against any behavious affecting my life. Similarly, I oppose all aspects of Islam which negatively affect my life, or the lives of others, but I support their right to follow their own religion until it crosses that line.
<P>
Hopefully that makes my position clear. Basically I just wanna tell jokes about Muhammad without fear of death or serious injury! Parody is not hate speech. Rev Mullen anti-gay comments <I>are</I>.
<hr size=1>
<B>Footnote:</B><BR>
Here's how homophobia hurts people:
<P>

<div align=center style="margin:0 0 5px 0";>
<object width="480" height="376">
  <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o7VodPX-4zM"></param>
  <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
  <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o7VodPX-4zM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="376"></embed>
</object>
<BR><B></B>
</div>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>The ever-changing Bible</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-10-06a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
The ever-changing Bible? How dare you? The word of God is inerrant and unchanging and... no, stop it, evangelists, and open your eyes, via this link to a story from the BBC:


The rival to the Bible

What is probably the oldest known bible is being ... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
The ever-changing Bible? How dare you? The word of God is inerrant and unchanging and... no, stop it, evangelists, and open your eyes, via this link to a story from the BBC:

<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7651105.stm"><B>The rival to the Bible</B></A>
<BR>
What is probably the oldest known bible is being digitised, reuniting its scattered parts for the first time since its discovery 160 years ago. It is markedly different from its modern equivalent.
<P>
For 1,500 years, the Codex Sinaiticus lay undisturbed in a Sinai monastery, until it was found - or stolen, as the monks say - in 1844 and split between Egypt, Russia, Germany and Britain.
<P>
Now these different parts are to be united online and, from next July, anyone, anywhere in the world with internet access will be able to view the complete text and read a translation.
<P>
For those who believe the Bible is the inerrant, unaltered word of God, there will be some very uncomfortable questions to answer. It shows there have been thousands of alterations to today's Bible.
<P>
And although many of the other alterations and differences are minor, these may take some explaining for those who believe every word comes from God.
<P>
Mr Ehrman was a born again Bible-believing Evangelical until he read the original Greek texts and noticed some discrepancies.
<P>
The Bible we now use can't be the inerrant word of God, he says, since what we have are the sometimes mistaken words copied by fallible scribes.
<P>
The Codex - and other early manuscripts - do not mention the ascension of Jesus into heaven, and omit key references to the Resurrection.
<P>
...missing is the story of the woman taken in adultery and about to be stoned - until Jesus rebuked the Pharisees (a Jewish sect), inviting anyone without sin to cast the first stone.
<P>
Nor are there words of forgiveness from the cross. Jesus does not say "Father forgive them for they know not what they do".
<P>
Fundamentalists, who believe every word in the Bible is true, may find these differences unsettling.
<P>
Others may take it as more evidence that the Bible is the word of man, not God.
</blockquote>

That last sentence really says it all perfectly, don't you think?

 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 66-70</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-10-05a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
In case you hadn't yet realised (where have you been?) I am writing a book of 100 songs, cruelly ripped from the belly of the best and biggest musicals of all time, their lyrics discarded and replaced with 100% BLASPHEMY!

For earlier extracts you'l... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<img src="http://www.gisburne.com/pix/promo03.gif" align=right style="margin:0 0 12px 12px;">In case you hadn't yet realised (where have you been?) I am writing a book of 100 songs, cruelly ripped from the belly of the best and biggest musicals of all time, their lyrics discarded and replaced with 100% BLASPHEMY!
<P>
For earlier extracts you'll need to look back to the <A HREF="http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09"><B>September 2008</B></A> blogs, but here are five more salacious snippets from <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>:


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>The Fakest Faith By Far</B><BR>
<I>Swinging On a Star</I> (Going My Way)
<BR>
<BR>The Mormon faith is fakest by far
<BR>Their beliefs are truly bizarre
<BR>With the strangest stories there are
<BR>And every Mormon is a fool
<BR>
<BR>The Mormon religion is a fantasy tale
<BR>It's hard to believe it wouldn't fail
<BR>Some ancient Jewish people sailed away
<BR>They built huge cities in the USA
<BR>And just for fun, Jesus wandered over too
<BR>They must be mad to think it's true



<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>They Praise, Preach, Hate, Chant And Sing</B><BR>
<I>I Just Can't Wait to be King</I> (The Lion King)
<BR>
<BR>The only thing that Jesus freaks
<BR>Do quietly is prayer
<BR>And if that was all they tried to do
<BR>I wouldn't really care
<BR>
<BR>But then they try converting me
<BR>It happens more and more
<BR>They stop me walking in the street
<BR>Or knock upon my door
<BR>
<BR>With news of how to save me from my sin
<BR>As they praise, preach, hate, chant and sing


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>He's Obsessed</B><BR>
<I>Be Our Guest</I> (Beauty And The Beast)
<BR>
<BR>He's obsessed, he's obsessed
<BR>Acts as though he's been possessed
<BR>The old man who lives next door to me
<BR>Is paranoid at best
<BR>
<BR>Blew a fuse when he learned
<BR>That religion I have spurned
<BR>Though an atheist can't harm him
<BR>His reaction was alarming


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Jesus Is Round</B><BR>
<I>Send In The Clowns</I> (A Little Night Music)
<BR>
<BR>Christ has an itch
<BR>Don't ask me where
<BR>Weighs more than four hundred pounds
<BR>Breaks every chair
<BR>Jesus is round
<BR>
<BR>Taking a piss?
<BR>Difficult move
<BR>Toilets are one thing he's found
<BR>He just can't use
<BR>Pees on the ground
<BR>Jesus is round


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>The Church Of Mindless Grins</B><BR>
<I>Colors Of The Wind</I> (Pocahontas)
<BR>
<BR>The only face you'll see them wear is gleeful
<BR>But a lesson in life is overdue
<BR>Religion only dulls the pain of living
<BR>Just one thing can pull you through, and that is you
<BR>
<BR>I would never give my life up to a cult of fools
<BR>It's clear their reason ends where faith begins
<BR>And however loud the madness they are shouting
<BR>I will never ask forgiveness for my sins
<BR>I will never join their Church of Mindless Grins
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Crosisborg I salute you!</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-10-04c</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
I've been a subscriber of Crosisborg for as long as I can remember, and I've featured one or two of his videos on this very site, but I never realised that he wrote alternative lyrics to songs... and as a bonus he sings them too!

Come, bow to the a... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
I've been a subscriber of <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/user/Crosisborg"><B>Crosisborg</B></A> for as long as I can remember, and I've featured one or two of his videos on this very site, but I never realised that he wrote alternative lyrics to songs... and as a bonus he sings them too!
<P>
Come, bow to the awesome brilliance of...
<P>

<div align=center style="margin:0 0 5px 0";>
<object width="480" height="376">
  <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zQt1NEFGVAM"></param>
  <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
  <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zQt1NEFGVAM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="376"></embed>
</object>
<BR><B>The YouTube Delusionists Pwnage Show</B>
</div>
<P>
<BR>

<div align=center style="margin:0 0 5px 0";>
<object width="480" height="376">
  <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RU_zRr_8Bgk"></param>
  <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
  <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RU_zRr_8Bgk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="376"></embed>
</object>
<BR><B>Science Believer</B>
</div>
<P>
<BR>
Looks like I have some serious competition now! But it's all good, baby!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Okay, WTF?!</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-10-04b</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
I do try to at least understand what religious people are talking about before I tell them where to go, but this time I admit defeat. Here's a message I received today:

Who's Telling, Living, Demonstrating whatever, we should, really, be doing it

... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
I do try to at least understand what religious people are talking about before I tell them where to go, but this time I admit defeat. Here's a message I received today:
<blockquote>
Who's Telling, Living, Demonstrating whatever, we should, really, be doing it
<P>
Dear Mr Gisburne
<P>
Yes, did all those who've, come and gone, know your answer?
<P>
Surely you can demonstrate, your answer, with a blank Piece of Paper, by simply folding and cutting, with the ability to explain only what you can show.
<P>
The reason for this Test, anybody can say anthing, anybody can write anything, so to find out, who know's, you seem too! what we should realllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllly be doing!
<P>
Simple, just Demonstrate! the Bottom Line
<P>
Await PIctures of Your Demonstration!
</blockquote>

Would someone, anyone, please reassure me with the knowledge that the above makes absolutely no sense whatsoever! Actually, when I looked at his YouTube channel I found a link to a web site:

<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://truth-revealed.name/"><B>Truth Revealed - Judeo Christian and the Glory of Yeshua</B></A>
</blockquote>

So the web site would explain things, right? Wrong! If anything, it is more ridiculous than the original message. All I could salvage from this idiot's train wreck of a web site is that (and I don't think I'm exaggerating here) he thinks that the path to true salvation lies through... ORIGAMI. Seriously. <A HREF="http://truth-revealed.name/plane.html"><B>This page</B></A> explains further (I use the word 'explains' very loosely), but for extra comedy try <A HREF="http://truth-revealed.name/futureguy.htm"><B>this one</B></A>, showing a cartoon of a man with no feet with the baffling subtitle '8 Toes and Mutating, Truth Prevailing' (another WTF? experience).
<P>
Just when you think religion can't possibly throw up anything more stupid, along comes a whole new category of idiot to prove you wrong. As Cypress Hill would say:
<blockquote>
Insane in da membrane<BR>
Insane in da brain
</blockquote>

Anyone care to argue with that assessment? Thought not.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Seeing both eyes may give Muslims a hard-on</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-10-04a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Given the cover of my new book, this article seems topical.


Saudi cleric favours one-eye veil
A Muslim cleric in Saudi Arabia has called on women to wear a full veil, or niqab, that reveals only one eye.

Sheikh Muhammad al-Habadan said showing bo... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Given the cover of my new book, this article seems topical.
<P>
<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7651231.stm"><B>Saudi cleric favours one-eye veil</B></A><BR>
A Muslim cleric in Saudi Arabia has called on women to wear a full veil, or niqab, that reveals only one eye.
<P>
Sheikh Muhammad al-Habadan said showing both eyes encouraged women to use eye make-up to look seductive.
<P>
The question of how much of her face a woman should cover is a controversial topic in many Muslim societies.
<P>
The niqab is more common in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf, but women in much of the Muslim Middle East wear a headscarf which covers only their hair.
<P>
Sheikh Habadan, an ultra-conservative cleric who is said to have wide influence among religious Saudis, was answering questions on the Muslim satellite channel al-Majd.
</blockquote>
<P>

<center>
<img src="http://www.gisburne.com/pix/blog/oneeye01.jpg" hspace=10>
<img src="http://www.gisburne.com/pix/blog/oneeye02.jpg" hspace=10>
</center>
<BR>

Topical and of course very, very stupid. These people are idiots. That's all there is to say.
<hr size=1>
<B>Update:</B><BR>
I found the following comment, by <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/user/EvocatusNL"><B>EvocatusNL</B></A>, on a <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-KHHKuVVRc"><B>YouTube video</B></A> from <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/user/patcondell"><B>Pat Condell</B></A>, which also mentioned the 'one eye good, two eyes horny' thing:
<blockquote>
I have a great commercial idea for you.
<P>
Design a burqa with NO eye-holes in it, but with a built-in GPS + LCD screen + Browser + Google Earth + additional software.
<P>
Moslima's can go out and their unseen winks can not seduce the male Muslims. That would put the Saudi cleric to rest.
<P>
We still have the problem of the female curvature inside the burqa while walking. That could make men horny. There should be an inbuild lightweight skeleton to form a rectangular... form.
</blockquote>
Don't for one second think that there isn't a chance it might happen. After all, who who have predicted that Gillette would put <A HREF="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/brandnewday/archives/2005/09/gillette_raise.html"><B>five blades in a razor</B></A>?! (That link is of course old news, but the commentary is hilarious.)
<P>
Here's that video:

<div align=center style="margin:0 0 5px 0";>
<object width="480" height="376">
  <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a-KHHKuVVRc"></param>
  <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
  <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a-KHHKuVVRc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="376"></embed>
</object>
<BR><B>Stop sharia law in Britain</B>
</div>
<hr size=1>
<B>Update 2:</B><BR>
The one-eyed veil has a problem - every time the woman blinks, it will look like she's winking, which of course will mean that Saudi men will be forced to rape her (that <I>is</I> why they have these ridicuolous religious laws, right?). The fun <A HREF="http://www.indiauncut.com/iublog/article/open-letter-to-sheikh-muhammad-al-habadan-re-veils/"><B>continues here</B></A>, with a solution which will have the Saudis thinking 'why didn't we think of that' (in Arabic, naturally).
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 61-65</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-30a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Welcome to five more extracts from my up-and-coming (soon!) book, Blasphemy! The Musical:





Don't Wanna Be Judged By You
I Wanna Be Loved By You (Some Like It Hot)

Don't wanna be judged by you, but you
Tell me what I must do
You're telling me wo... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Welcome to five more extracts from my up-and-coming (soon!) book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>:


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Don't Wanna Be Judged By You</B><BR>
<I>I Wanna Be Loved By You</I> (Some Like It Hot)
<BR>
<BR>Don't wanna be judged by you, but you
<BR>Tell me what I must do
<BR>You're telling me worship God alone
<BR>Pray to him too
<BR>...
<BR>You call me a liar
<BR>Condemn me to fire
<BR>What you seem to admire's
<BR>Unseen and unknown
<BR>To some, it's dumb, what you can succumb to


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Their Resistance</B><BR>
<I>Half A Sixpence</I> (Half A Sixpence)
<BR>
<BR>But still they're so insistent
<BR>That God has made all around us
<BR>The problem that now rebounds is
<BR>Why stop at just one?
<BR>
<BR>If they prove God's true
<BR>Couldn't there be two?
<BR>But they are so resistant their
<BR>Bible says there's just one


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>God's A Virgin Bride Explorer</B><BR>
<I>How Are Things In Glocca Morra?</I> (Finian's Rainbow)
<BR>
<BR>God's a virgin bride explorer
<BR>Knocked up Mary when he'd stripped her bare
<BR>He's the Daddy of that Jesus guy
<BR>God's kinda fly
<BR>Although it's such a shame about the facial hair
<BR>And big underwear


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Jesus Needs Shampoo</B><BR>
<I>Any Dream Will Do</I> (Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat)
<BR>
<BR>The son of God
<BR>Has come to visit
<BR>That smell what is it?
<BR>Jesus is that you?
<BR>Hair like a tramp
<BR>And wait a minute
<BR>Something's living in it
<BR>Jesus needs shampoo


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>I'll Never Be A Muslim </B><BR>
<I>I Don't Know How To Love Him</I> (Jesus Christ Superstar)
<BR>
<BR>I'll never be a Muslim
<BR>They have rules for some weird things
<BR>Islam's strange
<BR>And so deranged
<BR>What its laws deny
<BR>I can't justify
<BR>I won't fall in its spell
<BR>...
<BR>All that kneeling down
<BR>I can live without
<BR>Fasting dawn till dusk
<BR>I'm not that devout
<BR>For thinking genies do exist
<BR>You can count me out


<P><hr size=1><P>

Just about two-thirds done now, so it's definitely getting close to publishing time!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 56-60</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-25a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
60 songs! More extracts! More to come!





A Dangerous Parasite
Stranger In Paradise (Kismet)

Each Qur'an
Is a dangerous parasite
All feeding the hunger that
Swells claims to Islamicise
...
It's such a waste
All sense has ended
Minds cannot grow
W... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
60 songs! More extracts! More to come!


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>A Dangerous Parasite</B><BR>
<I>Stranger In Paradise</I> (Kismet)
<BR>
<BR>Each Qur'an
<BR>Is a dangerous parasite
<BR>All feeding the hunger that
<BR>Swells claims to Islamicise
<BR>...
<BR>It's such a waste
<BR>All sense has ended
<BR>Minds cannot grow
<BR>When such words are adored



<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>What Can He Do?</B><BR>
<I>Xanadu</I> (Xanadu)
<BR>
<BR>You claim
<BR>That Jesus can help you grow
<BR>But maybe you'd care to show
<BR>Tell me: what can he do?
<BR>
<BR>You bow
<BR>Praying to God, you plead
<BR>Why can you not concede
<BR>What your God cannot do?


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Christ Is A Lie That They've Sold Us</B><BR>
<I>Everything's Coming Up Roses</I> (Gypsy)
<BR>
<BR>Break the spell, break the hate
<BR>Never fall for the line 'God is great'
<BR>Can't you see? Look at how
<BR>Jesus Christ is a lie that they've sold us
<BR>
<BR>Can't detect any facts
<BR>No, the cleverest minds that would tax
<BR>God exists? Tell me how
<BR>Jesus Christ is a lie that they've sold us


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>That's Trash</B><BR>
<I>At Last</I> (Orchestra Wives)
<BR>
<BR>That's trash
<BR>Religion can't go on
<BR>The one they call Jehovah
<BR>Has faded now and gone
<BR>
<BR>That's trash
<BR>The ignorance I knew
<BR>Belief in God is over
<BR>And faith holds no more truth


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>None Of Us Knows</B><BR>
<I>Buttons and Bows</I> (The Paleface)
<BR>
<BR>Each release demands the best
<BR>Explanation science knows
<BR>If and when the answer's hidden
<BR>Then science never holds back as it shows
<BR>There's no answer, none of us knows
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Jehovah's Witness refuses blood, as expected</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-24a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Seems like I'm a prophet, because something in my book just came true! Remembering at all times that these are parodies, here are some of the lyrics to 'You Can't Stop Blasphemy', which blasphemes in turn against Christians, Muslims, Jehovah's Witne... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Seems like I'm a prophet, because something in my book just came true! Remembering at all times that these are parodies, here are some of the lyrics to 'You Can't Stop Blasphemy', which blasphemes in turn against Christians, Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons. The Jehovah's Witness section contains these lines (emphasis added to the most relevant one):
<blockquote>
And I know they'd like me to commit
<BR>To the Watchtower guide but it's full of shit
<BR>Can the end of the world please come so they'll quit today?
<BR>You can't stop blasphemy
<BR>
<BR>Grab a gun they're an easy kill
<BR><I>And if you wound 'em then they can't replace the blood that you spill</I>
<BR>I never felt the urge for homicide, at least not until today
<BR>
<BR>And I can't stop
<BR>Jehovah's little army coming up to my door
<BR>It's the moment I remind them what profanity's for
<BR>'cause it's surprising what a pit bull with your arm in its jaws conveys
<BR>My dog's called Blasphemy
</blockquote>

So (clich&eacute; alert) 'imagine my suprise' when I read this:

<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://www.religionnewsblog.com/22471/jehovahs-witness-shot-dead"><B>Jehovah's Witness shot dead and wife critically ill after being gunned down</B></A><BR>
Jehovah's Witness Adam Hustler and his wife Amanda were allegedly gunned down by their daughter's jilted lover who is believed to have been forced to end the relationship because of their strict religious views.
<P>
It is understood that the couple were strict followers of the religion and forced their eldest daughter Danielle, 20, to break up with her non-Witness boyfriend.
<P>
Jehovah's Witnesses are forbidden from receiving blood transfusions, and it is still unclear about whether one was needed.
<P>
Sources at the hospital said the gunman allegedly shot Mr Hustler at close range using a high powered gun such as a .22 hunting rifle, before blasting Amanda in the back.
</blockquote>
Here's a <A HREF="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1058867/Jehovahs-Witness-shot-dead-wife-critically-ill-gunned-daughters-jilted-boyfriend.html"><B>link to the original story</B></A> in the Daily Mail, which confirms that a blood transfusion was refused for the woman:
<blockquote>
Last night it emerged that 39-year-old Mrs Hustler, also a Jehovah's Witness, had refused a blood transfusion because of her strict religious beliefs.
</blockquote>
All I can say is: don't blame me, my song is just joking! However, here are a few of my thoughts on this. From what I can gather, the dead man was beyond help and died anyway, and the woman, who is the one who declined the blood transfusion, survived her operation. So perhaps the end result is exactly the same as it would have been had they not been Jehovah's Witnesses. Fair enough. And I do not in any way condone the shooting of anyone, anywhere, for any reason - a <A HREF="http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-04-25a"><B>previous blog of mine</B></A> will show you that I am 100% anti-guns. However, had the woman died purely because she refused a blood transfusion, my opinion would have been this: 'serves you right'. That may seem harsh, but anyone who makes that choice, with the full knowledge they will die because of it, will have no sympathy from me whatsoever. As far as I'm concerned, it then becomes suicide.
<P>
Of course Jehovah's Witnesses are quite capable of making these decisions on behalf of <I>other</I> people too, which is where I absolutely draw the line and refuse to accept such 'religious freedoms'. If you allow <I>someone else</I> to die (if the daughter had been shot and the mother had refused treatment for example) that is something I cannot and will never accept. And this certainly has happened before, although in cases where a child is involved hospitals now (as far as I know) have the power to over-rule any parent by taking the child into protective custody, so thankfully the law <I>will</I> defend a helpless child.
<P>
This is of course all because the Bible tells people not to eat blood, which the stupid Jehovah's Witnesses intepret as forbidding them to accept blood transfusions. As I've said many times before, of all religious groups, the Jehovah's Witnesses are the ones I despise the most vehemently!
<P>
One more thing: Witnesses supposedly don't eat blood, but if so why aren't they all vegetarians? You can't get <I>all</I> the blood out of the meat before you cook and eat it, so why don't they reject the eating of meat? As always, it comes down to this: <I>selective</I> interpretation of the Bible. Where it would be inconvenient to their daily lives (enforced vegetarianism would reduce the number of members, no doubt), they ignore it. Where something is likely to happen rarely, as in the case of blood transfusions, they parade their 'principles' for all to see. Hypocrisy and religion are never far away from each other are they?
<P>
Final words: I don't condone violence <I>at all</I>, so don't go shooting Jehovah's Witnesses just to prove my song true! Oh, and don't feed them to your dog either!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Now on Twitter</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-23a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Against my better judgement, I've now joined Twitter.com, so if you want constant online updates of what I'm doing, go here:


http://twitter.com/Gisburne2000


If it turns out that I get as bored of Twitter as I have already done with Facebook, MyS... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Against my better judgement, I've now joined Twitter.com, so if you want constant online updates of what I'm doing, go here:
<P>
<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://twitter.com/Gisburne2000"><B>http://twitter.com/Gisburne2000</B></A>
</blockquote>
<P>
If it turns out that I get as bored of <A HREF="http://twitter.com/Gisburne2000"><B>Twitter</B></A> as I have already done with <A HREF="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=686963539"><B>Facebook</B></A>, <A HREF="http://www.myspace.com/NickGisburne"><B>MySpace</B></A>, <A HREF="http://www.stickam.com/Gisburne2000"><B>Stickam</B></A> and all the rest of 'em, I'll let you know - probably in a couple of days, when the novelty has worn off! <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/Gisburne2000"><B>YouTube</B></A> is still the only place to be, so if you really want to find me, I'll be there.
<hr size=1>
<B>Update</B><BR>
Sure enough, a week later I deleted my Twitter account. It's the biggest waste of time <I>ever</I>, and given that it's in competition with all of the above, that's saying something. In other words, ignore this blog!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 51-55</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-22a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Five more songs completed, which means five more extracts from my new book, Blasphemy! The Musical, including the longest, most difficult and possibly the best one so far, You Can't Stop Blasphemy. If the book had a title track, that would probably ... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Five more songs completed, which means five more extracts from my new book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>, including the longest, most difficult and possibly the best one so far, <I>You Can't Stop Blasphemy</I>. If the book had a title track, that would probably be it. This blog also marks the point where I now have fewer songs to complete than I've already completed, so the finish line is in sight - stay tuned!


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>It's Just Another Book Of Fairy Tales And Lies</B><BR>
<I>As If We Never Said Goodbye</I> (Sunset Boulevard)
<BR>
<BR>Perhaps in desperation
<BR>When nothing else succeeded
<BR>And feeling low
<BR>It seems as though
<BR>It's needed
<BR>But the Bible you depend on
<BR>Has no heavenly foundation
<BR>It's just another book of fairy tales and lies


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>You Can't Stop Blasphemy</B><BR>
<I>You Can't Stop The Beat</I> (Hairspray)
<BR>
<BR>Draw a cartoon prophet then you'll find
<BR>That the peace-loving words are all far behind
<BR>With aggression is how their faith is defined today
<BR>You can't stop blasphemy
<BR>
<BR>Wanna die? Well just pick a fight
<BR>Insult Muhammad, they will march and set the city alight
<BR>And no surprises why security for flying is tight today
<BR>
<BR>But we won't stop
<BR>Rejecting all the rhetoric that's rolling around
<BR>The Qur'an is just a book of bullshit, not profound
<BR>And the morals of the prophet, they were never sound, no way
<BR>You can't stop blasphemy


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>See The Preacher's Threat</B><BR>
<I>Teacher's Pet</I> (School of Rock)
<BR>
<BR>Taking all the credit and praise
<BR>With extra glory on Sundays
<BR>God ain't love, just analyse the prize
<BR>The hidden message behind the lies
<BR>...
<BR>If you don't wanna see the preacher's threat
<BR>Well maybe you will live to regret it
<BR>This is the reason: God ain't divine
<BR>Your whole religion's a waste of time
<BR>Oh yea!


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Get Stoning</B><BR>
<I>Good Morning</I> (Singin' In The Rain)
<BR>
<BR>Get stoning, get stoning
<BR>Sign on the list if you
<BR>Want stoning, is stoning for you?
<BR>...
<BR>They're stoning, they're stoning
<BR>They'll chop your hands off too
<BR>Stop moaning, they're stoning it's true


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>One Last God</B><BR>
<I>Le Jazz Hot</I> (Victor/Victoria)
<BR>
<BR>Though it's crazy
<BR>The last god says he
<BR>Can conquer this world forever
<BR>Just who benefits if he is right?
<BR>Who must die to win the fight?
<BR>But we should end what they did
<BR>The past gods faded
<BR>So let's lose one last god
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! The Book Cover</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-18a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
I've been playing around with a few ideas for the book cover for Blasphemy! The Musical and was finally hit with the perfect design:





Simple, straightforward and in your face, plus it also lends itself well to re-arranging into banners, icons, s... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
I've been playing around with a few ideas for the book cover for <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B> and was finally hit with the perfect design:
<P>
<center>
<img src="http://www.gisburne.com/pix/blasphemy/cover01.gif">
</center>
<P>
Simple, straightforward and in your face, plus it also lends itself well to re-arranging into banners, icons, smaller pictures, etc (that's the web designer in me talking). I've done a makeover on <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/Gisburne2000"><B>my YouTube channel</B></A> and will eventually be doing a major overhaul of this web site. However, I still have 49 more songs to write so of course that takes priority. Back to work!
<P>
Anyone notice the highlights in the eyes?!
<P>
Hey, what do I have to do to get a fatwa over here?
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 46-50</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-16a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Wow, this is the tenth set of extracts from my new book, Blasphemy! The Musical, and it's so hot off the press it's still sizzling! I finished the 50th song just minutes ago - who would have thought it would be a parody of 'The Ugly Duckling'?!




... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Wow, this is the tenth set of extracts from my new book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>, and it's so hot off the press it's still sizzling! I finished the 50th song just minutes ago - who would have thought it would be a parody of 'The Ugly Duckling'?!


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Don't Believe In God Or Father Christmas</B><BR>
<I>Sisters</I> (White Christmas)
<BR>
<BR>Christmas
<BR>Christmas
<BR>Don't believe in God or Father Christmas
<BR>Santa never answers when you think of him
<BR>Don't pray to God, your chance is slim


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>That's The Worst Reason I've Heard</B><BR>
<I>I Enjoy Being a Girl</I> (Flower Drum Song)
<BR>
<BR>If you think that for marriage you must wait
<BR>And that sex with another's not permitted
<BR>If your faith gives no margin for debate
<BR>And you claim that a sin will be committed
<BR>...
<BR>If your only plea is Jesus
<BR>If your reason is God's own word
<BR>And Satan and sin deceive us
<BR>That's the worst reason I've heard


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>God Is A Kinky Old Perv</B><BR>
<I>The Impossible Dream</I> (Man of La Mancha)
<BR>
<BR>Your God is a kinky old perv
<BR>He hides everywhere that you go
<BR>He's there looking in through the window
<BR>Undress for a bath and he knows
<BR>...
<BR>God is a pest
<BR>Spies down from afar
<BR>Yes God is a pervert
<BR>He's really bizarre


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>God Is A Waste Of Space</B><BR>
<I>Put On A Happy Face</I> (Bye Bye Birdie)
<BR>
<BR>Listen to what I tell you
<BR>God is a waste of space
<BR>Leave what they try to sell you
<BR>God is a waste of space
<BR>
<BR>What do you get from years of reverence
<BR>Down on your knees?
<BR>Better to hand God final severance
<BR>Live your life free


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>A Muddle Of Doctrine</B><BR>
<I>The Ugly Duckling</I> (Hans Christian Andersen)
<BR>
<BR>Your faith is a muddle of doctrine
<BR>With dozens of differing creeds
<BR>But I've never heard
<BR>A line more absurd than
<BR>God rewards good deeds
<BR>God rewards
<BR>Yes God rewards
<BR>Yes God rewards good deeds
<BR>But you seem to have missed
<BR>I deny that God exists
<BR>So your argument just misleads


<P><hr size=1><P>


Now that you're up to date with where I am, I'm afraid the updates won't be so frequent - I can only write one song, sometimes two, in a day, so you'll need to be patient! However this is a major milestone - 50 is half way to the final 100, and if I keep up the same steady pace the book will be finished in around 6 or 7 weeks. So you'll be able to get your grubby little paws on a copy in early November!
<P>
Keep watching!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 41-45</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-15a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
You guessed it, more extracts from my up-and-coming new book, Blasphemy! The Musical...





Who Thinks That God Was Never There?
Who Wants To Be a Millionaire? (High Society)

Who thinks that God was never there?    I do
Who sees how pointless is a... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
You guessed it, more extracts from my up-and-coming new book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Who Thinks That God Was Never There?</B><BR>
<I>Who Wants To Be a Millionaire?</I> (High Society)
<BR>
<BR>Who thinks that God was never there?    I do
<BR>Who sees how pointless is a prayer? I do
<BR>You think a better life will come if you wait?
<BR>But why such debate
<BR>When this life is great?
<BR>Who thinks religion is insane?  I do
<BR>Who treats the Bible with disdain?  I do
<BR>Who thinks the Testaments are untrue?   I do
<BR>Yes I do and so in fact should you


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Prove It's God</B><BR>
<I>All That Jazz</I> (Chicago)
<BR>
<BR>You may think there's someone up above
<BR>So prove it's God
<BR>Someone who knows the bad things you are thinking of
<BR>So prove it's God
<BR>Preach the Bible, show me what you've got
<BR>But a book ain't proof and evidence it's not
<BR>The claims are looking small
<BR>Your case will trip and fall
<BR>So prove it's God


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>World Ain't Ending</B><BR>
<I>Hey, Big Spender</I> (Sweet Charity)
<BR>
<BR>Well every time that you talk
<BR>If the word is from Jehovah, a Witness
<BR>The world is ending
<BR>Big earthquakes, plagues and fire
<BR>They're saying the world will blow
<BR>And that the future is dire
<BR>
<BR>Well maybe this might disappoint
<BR>The Apocalypse is wrong I guarantee
<BR>World ain't ending
<BR>End your little fantasy


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Pre-Teen Preacher From Bible Class</B><BR>
<I>Mean Green Mother From Outer Space</I> (Little Shop Of Horrors)
<BR>
<BR>He's just a pre-teen preacher from Bible class
<BR>And too small
<BR>He's just a pre-teen preacher from Bible class
<BR>And he's had no life at all
<BR>A little pre-teen preacher's too young to pray
<BR>Say, 'Put down that book, go out and play
<BR>And don't preach, pre-teen, you're way too small'


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Don't Save Me</B><BR>
<I>Lovely</I> (A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum)
<BR>
<BR>Don't save me
<BR>No one needs to save me
<BR>Saving doesn't come into my day
<BR>
<BR>Prayed for
<BR>Why should I be prayed for?
<BR>Why the need to tell me when you pray?


<P><hr size=1><P>


Tomorrow's selection will get you right up to date with the 50 songs I've written so far! Actually, as I write this I've only done 49, so I'd better get a move on!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 36-40</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-14a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
A few more days and the blog will have caught up with the current progress of my book, Blasphemy! The Musical. So here are five more extracts to add to the total!





God Is In Retreat
42nd Street (42nd Street)

We don't need God to succeed
Every n... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
A few more days and the blog will have caught up with the current progress of my book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>. So here are five more extracts to add to the total!


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>God Is In Retreat</B><BR>
<I>42nd Street</I> (42nd Street)
<BR>
<BR>We don't need God to succeed
<BR>Every new breakthrough makes stronger the view
<BR>God is in retreat
<BR>If you fear what isn't here
<BR>Then the one thing true I promise to you
<BR>God is in retreat


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Meet The Latter Day Saints</B><BR>
<I>A Couple of Swells</I> (Easter Parade)
<BR>
<BR>Meet the Latter Day Saints
<BR>Their Church is bizarre but quaint
<BR>Those Mormons may seem normal
<BR>Let me tell you they really ain't
<BR>...
<BR>They will run down the avenue
<BR>If you chase them with a knife
<BR>If you're quick you can run 'em through
<BR>End their irritating life
<BR>Though we don't recommend you do
<BR>'cause it isn't very nice
<BR>So they'll keep on annoying you
<BR>Yes they're deeply annoying you
<BR>As they talk 'bout some crappy new after-life


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>The Trouble Is Your Religion</B><BR>
<I>Tomorrow</I> (Annie)
<BR>
<BR>The trouble is your religion
<BR>Shows me its derision
<BR>'cause religion
<BR>I have none
<BR>...
<BR>Religion
<BR>Religion
<BR>Don't preach your religion
<BR>There's nothing could make me pray


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>What's This Crap? It's Creation Science</B><BR>
<I>Little April Shower</I> (Bambi)
<BR>
<BR>What's this crap? It's Creation Science
<BR>God never made all the world all around
<BR>Rip apart the Creation Science
<BR>Thousand and one little holes to be found
<BR>Watch as we pound, into the ground
<BR>This crap, it's crap


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>I Am Tripping</B><BR>
<I>I Feel Pretty</I> (West Side Story)
<BR>
<BR>I am tripping
<BR>Mind is skipping
<BR>Like a hippie I'm trippy and why?
<BR>I am flipping
<BR>Revelation kinda gets me high
<BR>...
<BR>Have you read the book Revelation?
<BR>The writer it's plain lost the plot
<BR>Apparently God's inspiration
<BR>Made him try to get high and grow mushrooms and pot


<P><hr size=1><P>


More tomorrow!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 31-35</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-13a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
That's right, more extracts from the songs in Blasphemy! The Musical...





The Bible Is Full Of Crap
Thomas O'Malley Cat (The Aristocats)

They wanna teach 'n' preach baloney
Make us all become
Such devoted faith-loving slabs of dumb
They're talki... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
That's right, more extracts from the songs in <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>The Bible Is Full Of Crap</B><BR>
<I>Thomas O'Malley Cat</I> (The Aristocats)
<BR>
<BR>They wanna teach 'n' preach baloney
<BR>Make us all become
<BR>Such devoted faith-loving slabs of dumb
<BR>They're talkin' up Creation
<BR>Short on explanation
<BR>Why read the Bible?
<BR>The Bible is full of crap


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>She's In A Trance Alright</B><BR>
<I>I Could Have Danced All Night</I> (My Fair Lady)
<BR>
<BR>She's in a trance alright
<BR>And there's a chance, though slight
<BR>She speaks an ancient tongue
<BR>The Church has taught such things
<BR>And now their madness brings
<BR>What's drilled into our young


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Real Science Can Change the World</B><BR>
<I>Thank Heaven For Little Girls</I> (Gigi)
<BR>
<BR>Real science can change the world
<BR>The scientists work hard while others pray
<BR>Real science can change the world
<BR>Religion hasn't any part to play


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>If You Can</B><BR>
<I>Be A Clown</I> (The Pirate)
<BR>
<BR>If you can, if you can
<BR>Use your faith, if you can
<BR>Make it rain when it's dry
<BR>Wait for long enough so can I
<BR>Without God for a friend
<BR>Get the same results in the end
<BR>You see a burning building or a terrible quake
<BR>'A miracle!' you cry as one survives in its wake
<BR>But now explain the dead ones God decided to take
<BR>If you can, if you can, if you can


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>They're Controlling Our World</B><BR>
<I>I Can Show You The World</I> (Aladdin)
<BR>
<BR>They're controlling our world
<BR>Criticism's forbidden
<BR>Islam's purpose is hidden:
<BR>Democratic rule must die
<BR>
<BR>Let them into our world
<BR>Offer them all our freedoms
<BR>There's a reason they need them
<BR>But conceal the reason why


<P><hr size=1><P>


There are plenty more to come, so stay tuned!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 26-30</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-12a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Whoops! Missed a day! Yesterday I took a day off to design the cover for the book... top secret, naturally! However, back on track again, here are some more extracts from Blasphemy! The Musical...





Theory
Memory (Cats)

Theory
Used in science it... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Whoops! Missed a day! Yesterday I took a day off to design the cover for the book... top secret, naturally! However, back on track again, here are some more extracts from <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Theory</B><BR>
<I>Memory</I> (Cats)
<BR>
<BR>Theory
<BR>Used in science it brings light
<BR>Understand what the word says
<BR>Find its meaning again
<BR>Out of context some think it's what hypothesis is
<BR>But a theory's not the same



<P><hr size=1><P>
<B>Christ Is Too Fat To Weigh</B><BR>
<I>(Life Is A) Cabaret</I> (Cabaret)
<BR>
<BR>Waiting for Jesus? Don't look for him soon
<BR>No matter how you pray
<BR>Look at the slob your God's become
<BR>Christ is too fat to weigh
<BR>
<BR>There is no quitting, he loves to consume
<BR>The all-you-can-eat buffet
<BR>Empties the plate, eats every crumb
<BR>Christ is too fat to weigh



<P><hr size=1><P>
<B>Resist!</B><BR>
<I>What's This?</I> (The Nightmare Before Christmas)
<BR>
<BR>Resist! Resist!
<BR>Those Christians who dare
<BR>Insist
<BR>They offer you a prayer
<BR>Resist!
<BR>They buzz around like flies
<BR>You feel like screaming
<BR>Getting closer to despair
<BR>Resist!



<P><hr size=1><P>
<B>Scientologists</B><BR>
<I>Puttin' On The Ritz</I> (Blue Skies)
<BR>
<BR>Now it's untrue
<BR>So don't believe
<BR>What they show you
<BR>They just deceive
<BR>Whose cult is this?
<BR>Scientologists



<P><hr size=1><P>
<B>There's Mo Hammad, He's So Hammered
</B><BR>
<I>There's No Business Like Show Business</I> (Annie Get Your Gun)
<BR>
<BR>There's Mo Hammad, he's so hammered
<BR>Let's go Hammad, hey Mo!
<BR>Looking very queasy when he's kneeling
<BR>Always has a bottle when he prays
<BR>There's projectile vomit on the ceiling
<BR>It's certain he'll sing, he's in a daze



<P><hr size=1><P>


Come back tomorrow - there will be more... unless I skip a day again!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 21-25</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-10a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Still more extracts from some of the songs in my forthcoming book, Blasphemy! The Musical...





They Stop By Most
High Hopes (A Hole in the Head)

Just who sends those Latter-Day Saints
Back for more, despite my complaints
Anyone thinks they're qu... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Still more extracts from some of the songs in my forthcoming book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>They Stop By Most</B><BR>
<I>High Hopes</I> (A Hole in the Head)
<BR>
<BR>Just who sends those Latter-Day Saints
<BR>Back for more, despite my complaints
<BR>Anyone thinks they're quaint ain't
<BR>Met the Latter-Day Saints
<BR>
<BR>'cause they stop by most
<BR>They drop by most
<BR>Wonder
<BR>Why God supplies
<BR>Such a high dose


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>You're An Atheist</B><BR>
<I>Aquarius</I> (Hair)
<BR>
<BR>When your faith in prayer passes on
<BR>Religion plays no further part
<BR>If hope seems gone without it
<BR>It's time for life to start
<BR>
<BR>Don't be afraid
<BR>Come out and say you're an atheist
<BR>Today you're an atheist
<BR>
<BR>An atheist!
<BR>An atheist!


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Religion Is Just A Con-Trick</B><BR>
<I>The Teddy Bears' Picnic</I>
<BR>
<BR>If you kneel down in a church to pray
<BR>You'll never hear God's reply
<BR>Instead they'll ask you to try to pay
<BR>God's credit's in short supply
<BR>The Jesus freaks are careful to teach
<BR>The love of God whenever they preach
<BR>But it's a bust, religion is just a con-trick


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Drink The Communion Wine</B><BR>
<I>Trail of the Lonesome Pine</I> (Way Out West)
<BR>
<BR>If you catch a priest committing sin ya
<BR>Get to drink the communion wine
<BR>If his porn you find
<BR>He's more than kind
<BR>Just don't tell the bishop, he won't mind


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Don't Call Me Christ, I'm Christina</B><BR>
<I>Don't Cry For Me Argentina</I> (Evita)
<BR>
<BR>Don't call me Christ, I'm Christina
<BR>The truth is I wear stilettos
<BR>I've had my legs shaved
<BR>And I'm insistent
<BR>I have no penis
<BR>It's non-existent


<P><hr size=1><P>


Come back tomorrow - there's more!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 16-20</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-09a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
More, more, more extracts from some of the songs in my forthcoming book, Blasphemy! The Musical...





Godless and Free
Under the Sea (The Little Mermaid)

Belief in a life hereafter
A place full of endless bliss
Is something to greet with laughter... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
More, more, more extracts from some of the songs in my forthcoming book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Godless and Free</B><BR>
<I>Under the Sea</I> (The Little Mermaid)
<BR>
<BR>Belief in a life hereafter
<BR>A place full of endless bliss
<BR>Is something to greet with laughter
<BR>A thought we should all dismiss
<BR>...
<BR>Godless and free
<BR>Godless and free
<BR>Life without Jesus
<BR>No Hell to tease us
<BR>No mystery
<BR>
<BR>One life to live, there's no repeat
<BR>Don't need a God to be complete
<BR>Love one another
<BR>There is no other
<BR>Godless and free


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Communion Wine I Have Found Confusing</B><BR>
<I>The Sound of Music</I> (The Sound of Music)
<BR>
<BR>Communion wine
<BR>I have found confusing
<BR>It turns into blood
<BR>And like bats they drink
<BR>
<BR>This vampire-ish sign
<BR>Would be quite amusing
<BR>But follow the Pope
<BR>And it's what you'll think


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Why Should God Be On A Murder Charge?</B><BR>
<I>Wand'rin' Star</I> (Paint Your Wagon)
<BR>
<BR>Why should God be on a murder charge?
<BR>Why should God be on a murder charge?
<BR>
<BR>Open up the Bible
<BR>Pick most any page
<BR>And god will slaughter countless millions
<BR>In a fit of rage


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Indoctrinate, Indoctrinate, Indoctrinate!</B><BR>
<I>The Deadwood Stage</I> (Calamity Jane)
<BR>
<BR>Well a real good age for a Christian kid to learn sin
<BR>Is the time his parents know for certain their Bible sinks in
<BR>They teach God's commands, no reason to wait
<BR>Indoctrinate, indoctrinate, indoctrinate!
<BR>...
<BR>In a homeschool class be amazed what the Bible kids buy
<BR>Never trust real science, evolution is the wickedest lie
<BR>Darwin reviled, Creation is great
<BR>So indoctrinate, indoctrinate, indoctrinate!


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Where Did All Of Their Brains Go?</B><BR>
<I>Over the Rainbow</I> (The Wizard of Oz)
<BR>
<BR>Where did all of their brains go?
<BR>Where'd they hide?
<BR>In the minds of believers
<BR>Reason and faith collide
<BR>...
<BR>If faith waves common sense goodbye
<BR>It's something I know
<BR>I just cannot buy


<P><hr size=1><P>


Come back tomorrow for even more!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 11-15</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-08a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
As promised here are more extracts from some of the songs in my forthcoming book, Blasphemy! The Musical...





Meatball Wiccan
Pinball Wizard (Tommy)

There was nobody who liked her
She had no friends to call
Her face it used to frighten
The cool ... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
As promised here are more extracts from some of the songs in my forthcoming book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Meatball Wiccan</B><BR>
<I>Pinball Wizard</I> (Tommy)
<BR>
<BR>There was nobody who liked her
<BR>She had no friends to call
<BR>Her face it used to frighten
<BR>The cool kids in the mall
<BR>And at school she didn't like gym
<BR>No exercise at all
<BR>That fat, ugly goth kid
<BR>Goes by the name 'Meatball'
<BR>...
<BR>She's a meatball Wiccan
<BR>Loves magic, moon and trees
<BR>Adores fried chicken
<BR>Eats everything she sees


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Proof Is All That I Want</B><BR>
<I>You're The One That I Want</I> (Grease)
<BR>
<BR>All your claims and prophesying
<BR>To mislead is your goal
<BR>And the lies you're justifying
<BR>Are intensifying
<BR>...
<BR>Proof is all that I want
<BR>(Bring out the evidence)
<BR>Prove God's true, sonny
<BR>It's all I need
<BR>Then I'll concede


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Does It Annoy You?</B><BR>
<I>Getting To Know You</I> (The King and I)
<BR>
<BR>Does it annoy you
<BR>Hearing that God's all around you
<BR>Does it annoy you
<BR>When they insist you should pray
<BR>Does it annoy you
<BR>Giving you some constant strife while
<BR>Saying your lifestyle
<BR>Has gone astray


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Creationists Can</B><BR>
<I>The Candy Man Can</I> (Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory)
<BR>
<BR>Who can look at science
<BR>Tell you it ain't true
<BR>Quote you from the Bible like it beats the peer review?
<BR>
<BR>Creationists! Creationists can
<BR>Creationists can, cause it's Genesis that's making
<BR>Noah's Ark look good


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Their Chanting's Really Getting On My Nerves</B><BR>
<I>The Phantom of the Opera</I> (The Phantom of the Opera)
<BR>
<BR>They moved next door to me
<BR>Now life's a strain
<BR>It's one big noise to me
<BR>Sends me insane
<BR>Those Buddhists driving me
<BR>Out of my mind
<BR>Their chanting's really getting on my nerves
<BR>No peace I find


<P><hr size=1><P>


Still more tomorrow!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 6-10</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-07a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Short extracts from five more of the songs in my forthcoming book, Blasphemy! The Musical. Today...





They'll Say Anything
I'd Do Anything (Oliver!)

They'll say anything
To please God, anything
And all things Biblical are true
They're taught tha... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Short extracts from five more of the songs in my forthcoming book, <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>. Today...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>They'll Say Anything</B><BR>
<I>I'd Do Anything</I> (Oliver!)
<BR>
<BR>They'll say anything
<BR>To please God, anything
<BR>And all things Biblical are true
<BR>They're taught that
<BR>Satan's everywhere
<BR>There's no good anywhere
<BR>We're evil sinners through and through


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>God Is Never There</B><BR>
<I>Walking In The Air</I> (The Snowman)
<BR>
<BR>Your God is never there
<BR>You pray but you don't wonder why
<BR>He cannot say hello
<BR>There's no-one to reply
<BR>...
<BR>Now your mind cannot grow
<BR>Prayers make it sleep
<BR>Understanding has its price
<BR>Faith is cheap


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Their Religion Is Insane</B><BR>
<I>There Is Nothin' Like A Dame</I> (South Pacific)
<BR>
<BR>Their religion is insane
<BR>Foolish and absurd
<BR>File the Bible under 'lame'
<BR>Christianity's quite insane
<BR>
<BR>It's so easy to explain
<BR>In a single word
<BR>Read the Bible and proclaim
<BR>That its followers are insane


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>So You Wanna Be A Baptist</B><BR>
<I>So You Wanna Be A Boxer</I> (Bugsy Malone)
<BR>
<BR>So you wanna be a Baptist
<BR>We're a big success
<BR>Any laws God didn't issue
<BR>We will suppress
<BR>
<BR>If you drink or you bet
<BR>Turn around you're a threat
<BR>We don't need you
<BR>Smokin' weed, sellin' dope
<BR>If you don't think the Pope's
<BR>Gonna lead you
<BR>Into Satan's great pit
<BR>Bible says you ain't fit


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Praying For The World To End</B><BR>
<I>Diamonds Are A Girl's Best Friend</I> (Gentlemen Prefer Blondes)
<BR>
<BR>The rumours of war
<BR>Will be so instrumental
<BR>When praying for the world to end
<BR>The past had far more
<BR>But that's coincidental
<BR>Now they take delight
<BR>The end's in sight, the timing's right
<BR>
<BR>Famines grow and we all know
<BR>This is far from a new global trend
<BR>But they think the food link
<BR>Ties up with God's time sync
<BR>Praying for the world to end


<P><hr size=1><P>


More tomorrow!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! Songs 1-5</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-06a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
As announced earlier this month, I am currently writing 100 songs for a book provisionally called Blasphemy! The Musical, in which I'm creating new lyrics for well-known show tunes. So that you know exactly what you'll be getting in the final book, ... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
As announced earlier this month, I am currently writing 100 songs for a book provisionally called <B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B>, in which I'm creating new lyrics for well-known show tunes. So that you know exactly what you'll be getting in the final book, I've decided to release short extracts from each song, plus the original titles of the movies/shows in which they can be found. I'll be posting 5 songs per day until I catch up with the current list. As I write I've already written 35 songs, so this will take a while! Here goes...


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Three Little Parts of God</B><BR>
<I>Three Little Maids From School</I> (The Mikado)
<BR>
<BR>Three little parts of God are we
<BR>Joined into one - the Trinity
<BR>Quite a conundrum you'll agree
<BR>Three little parts of God
<BR>...
<BR>Three little parts, and each all-knowing
<BR>Part of a lie which keeps on growing
<BR>Logic and reason, neither's showing
<BR>Three little parts of God


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>I Am The Very Model of a Knowledgeable Atheist</B><BR>
<I>I Am The Very Model Of A Modern Major-General</I> (The Pirates of Penzance)
<BR>
<BR>I am the very model of a knowledgeable atheist
<BR>I've information Catholic and Mormon and Creationist
<BR>I know the Ten Commandments and the books of all the Testaments
<BR>It's certainly incredible for some they still have relevance
<BR>...
<BR>The Bible I have studied more than most in Christianity
<BR>I'm excellent at pointing out the flaws in its theology
<BR>In short, in matters Methodist and Baptist and Evangelist
<BR>I am the very model of a knowledgeable atheist


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>A School Full of Science</B><BR>
<I>A Spoonful of Sugar</I> (Mary Poppins)
<BR>
<BR>ID just doesn't pass the test
<BR>Their so-called scientists detest
<BR>All critical attempts to probe and dig
<BR>They try an ever-changing route
<BR>To counter each thing we refute
<BR>We'll prove them wrong - it won't take very long
<BR>
<BR>For a school full of science breaks Intelligent Design
<BR>There isn't any sign
<BR>Of evidence divine
<BR>Just a school full of science breaks Intelligent Design
<BR>Leaving it in disarray


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Freak Cult Sci-Fi</B><BR>
<I>Sweet Transvestite</I> (Rocky Horror Picture Show)
<BR>
<BR>Where were you in
<BR>'52 when
<BR>L Ron had the plan?
<BR>He wrote some part of it down
<BR>Really went to town
<BR>That's where this story all began
<BR>
<BR>It's so far out
<BR>But a tempting hook
<BR>Just take the bait to discover
<BR>When your audit began
<BR>You paid cash in hand
<BR>And your credit may never recover
<BR>
<BR>Believe in freak cult sci-fi
<BR>It's all fictional
<BR>Scientology


<P><hr size=1><P>


<B>Al-Qaeda!</B> (al-ky-ee-da)<BR>
<I>Oklahoma!</I> (Oklahoma!)
<BR>
<BR>Al-Qaeda!
<BR>Training mad jihadis for the planes
<BR>Quote an ancient book and make it look
<BR>Like the Muslim world has gone insane
<BR>Al-Qaeda!
<BR>Only crazed fanatics should apply
<BR>Taking bombs worldwide for suicide
<BR>So that crowds of infidels will die


<P><hr size=1><P>
Remember that these are just extracts - the final book will contain the full sing-along versions of 100 beautifully blasphemous songs! More extracts tomorrow!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Blasphemy! The Musical - New book in progress!</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-09-03a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Big news! And the reason I've been so quiet for a while!

My forthcoming book will contain 100 songs from the great musicals and shows!

Okay, before you come out with 'WTF?!' here's the why and the what...



Blasphemy! The Musical



...with alter... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Big news! And the reason I've been so quiet for a while!
<P>
My forthcoming book will contain 100 songs from the great musicals and shows!
<P>
Okay, before you come out with 'WTF?!' here's the why and the what...
<P>
<center>
<hr size=1 width=75%>
<font size=4><B>Blasphemy! The Musical</B></font>
<hr size=1 width=75%>
</center>
<P>
...with alternative lyrics, naturally! Songs such as:
<P>
<UL>
<LI>Godless and Free
<LI>Their Religion Is Insane
<LI>A School Full of Science
<LI>Religion Is Just A Con-Trick
<LI>Christ Is Too Fat To Weigh
<LI>So You Wanna Be A Baptist
<LI>Don't Call Me Christ, I'm Christina
<LI>Indoctrinate, Indoctrinate, Indoctrinate!
<LI>There's Mo Hammad, He's So Hammered
<LI>Their Chanting's Really Getting On My Nerves
<LI>I Am The Very Model of a Knowledgeable Atheist
</UL>
...and many more 'alternative' show tunes!
<P>

For up-to-date progress, I currently have a slider showing on my <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/gisburne2000"><B>YouTube channel</B></A>, where you will also find a playlist containing the original songs. Match my new titles with the originals!
<P>
Release date? Tentatively I would say 'early November', which ain't all that far away.
<P>
More news will follow, so stay tuned!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>The universe is not so fine-tuned after all</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-08-18b</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
One of the mainstays of the Intelligent Design movement is the idea that if any of the laws of physics were not exactly as we find them in our universe, galaxies, stars, and indeed life-bearing planets, could not have come into being.

Not so.



Ca... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
One of the mainstays of the Intelligent Design movement is the idea that if any of the laws of physics were not exactly as we find them in our universe, galaxies, stars, and indeed life-bearing planets, could not have come into being.
<P>
Not so.
<P>
<blockquote>

<A HREF="http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/35363/title/Stars_ablaze_in_other_skies"><B>Calculations find that many universes could sustain stars</B></A><BR>
Fred Adams sees stars in the most unlikely places.
<P>
His calculations suggest that, contrary to some previous claims, stars are not only common in our cosmos but are also ablaze in myriad other universes, where the laws of physics may be drastically different. Even in a cosmos where balls of gas and dust never collapse and ignite to make conventional stars, radiation produced by black holes and clumps of invisible material called dark matter may play the same role as stars, says Adams, a theorist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
<P>
By allowing all three of the parameters, rather than a single parameter, to vary, Adams created a simulation that may embrace a larger number of possible universes, he says. He finds that stars are stable entities in roughly one-fourth of the universes he considered. "That's a sizable amount of real estate."
<P>
Had Adams found that the range of parameters that allowed for stars was very small, that would have suggested that the laws of physics in our universe have been "fine-tuned" to allow for star formation, Aguirre notes. Instead, Adams' study shows that our universe doesn't seem particularly special in that regard.
<P>
"This open-minded approach can serve, in some cases, as a counter-argument to claims that our universe is fine-tuned for life."
</blockquote>

Another argument for creation bites the (star) dust.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Praying for petrol prices</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-08-18a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
We call it petrol, you might call it gas, but whatever it is you'll know that the price has been going up and up and up... until recently that is, when oil prices have fallen back and prices at the pump have started to go down a little. So who gets ... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
We call it petrol, you might call it gas, but whatever it is you'll know that the price has been going up and up and up... until recently that is, when oil prices have fallen back and prices at the pump have started to go down a little. So who gets credit for this reduction? Who else? God, that's who.
<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7566566.stm"><B>Petrol pump pilgrims keep faith</B></A><BR>
A prayer group in Washington DC is claiming the credit for the recent sharp drop in the US price of petrol.
<P>
Rocky Twyman, 59, a veteran community campaigner, started Pray At The Pump meetings at petrol stations in April.
<P>
Since then, the average price of what the US calls gasoline has fallen from more than $4 a gallon to $3.80.
<P>
"We don't have anybody else to turn to but God," Mr Twyman told the BBC. "We have to turn these problems over to God and not to man."
<P>
His first pilgrimage to the pump was prompted by fellow volunteers at the First Seventh Day Adventist Church in Petworth, a working-class neighbourhood of the US capital, who were struggling with higher gasoline prices.
<P>
He led them down the block to the local Shell gas station to pray. And over the months since then, he has held similar prayer meetings at pumps all over the US.
<P>
<B>Prayer warriors</B>
<P>
"We were down in Huntsville, Alabama. We finished praying," Mr Twyman said. "Immediately the owners came out and changed the gas prices. They brought it down. We had marvellous success down in St Louis, Missouri."
<P>
This week the group returned to the site of their first prayer meeting to celebrate. Singing "We shall overcome," they changed the words of the well-known hymn to "We'll have lower gas prices".
<P>
Mr Twyman is sceptical that market forces might be responsible for the lower prices. But he and his prayer warriors have changed their motoring habits.
<P>
"We believe not just in prayer - because we believe that faith without works is dead. So we've encouraged people to car-pool more and organise their days more, because it's a combination of faith with these other factors."
<P>
Pray At The Pump plans to build on its success and drive gasoline prices even lower. In the words of Rocky Twyman: "We just thank God for blessing us with small victories and we expect greater things to come."
</blockquote>
Of particular note is the fact that this moron is 'sceptical that market forces might be responsible for the lower prices'. So what made the prices so high in the first place? Pixies? Of course, he never blames God for bringing on the massive price hikes which preceded this does he? No, no, that would be Satan's fault, right?
<P>
See what has happened here? Some idiot preacher has enough common sense and craftiness to realise that sooner or later the price of oil really did have to fall, simply because its peak was caused by speculation in the market rather than actual shortage of supply. So he started to pray that this would happen, in the full knowledge that it would happen anyway, with or without prayer. It's like praying for rain - during a drought, if you pray long enough, it is guaranteed that it <I>will</I> rain. Eventually. And so it goes on, with these prayer groups demonstrating apparent success, and probably converting more gullible fools as they do so.
<P>
Expect more stories like this when the housing market starts to pick up again. "I dun prayed fer the credit crunch t' end and the good Lord heard ma voice. Praise Jeeeeesus."
<P>
I don't think further comment from me is necessary other than, "Get a fucking grip on reality, you stupid, deluded, ignorant bastards."

<hr size=1>
<B>Footnote:</B><BR>
<A HREF="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/05/30/ST2008053003189.html"><B>This article</B></A>, posted in May before the prices began to fall, notes that the prayer gatherings are not entirely welcomed by the fuel station owners: "Last week, as one of the demonstrations was winding down, an angry gas station manager in Petworth chased them from the property, Twyman said, annoyed that the activists were hampering business." And page two of the article just confirms what I mentioned about the rain. This same group did exactly what I suggested - praying for rain, only for rain to eventually fall. It's always easy to take credit if something is certain to happen.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Digging for Victory</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-08-08a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
See what I did there? I disappeared from view again! Okay, this time I am making the most of the good weather and doing some serious gardening. The exercise I've been doing this year (I've lost well over 50 pounds) means that I can now do way more t... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
See what I did there? I disappeared from view again! Okay, this time I am making the most of the good weather and doing some serious gardening. The exercise I've been doing this year (I've lost well over 50 pounds) means that I can now do way more than a couple of hours without getting exhausted or feeling ill, which is fantastic. It also means I have less time on the computer. Which is also great - <I>real</I> life is much more interesting, after all.
<P>
The garden is a big job. I've lived in this house for 18 years and have done the absolute minimum outside. And I do mean <I>minimum</I> - when the grass grows tall enough so that I can't see my dogs out there I cut it, and that's basically it. Sometimes not even that! I have a pile of concrete slabs outside which have been there for several years waiting to be laid down as a patio. Still waiting. Until last month (the start of my adventures in the garden) I had a garden with a surface like a rollercoaster because over the years soil had built up in the jungle undergrowth. I've had to strip the entire layer of grass and soil off and am in the process of digging it level and at the same time removing any unwanted growing things (in this case, that is <I>everything</I>).
<P>
So that's why I'm away. And it's going to be a while. But I do have a project on the go, a big, exciting thing which I'm writing and which, funnily enough, the gardening is helping. While I dig, my mind is clear of the clutter which usually bombards it when I sit down in front of the computer (the Internet is a habit which is hard to kick), and outside I get more and more ideas, and frequently have to run into the house to write them down. Today was particularly productive in that respect - at one point I just stopped going back outside for a while because I was writing down so much. With pen and paper - no keyboard involved. Anyone still remember when that was the only way to write things?! In the time when I am actually still in the house, or when the weather is bad so I can't go out, I turn the ideas into... things. I can say no more. If I did I might jinx it. Suffice to say, it's something you would never <I>ever</I> expect from me. Or indeed from any of the other YouTube atheists. 'Different' is not the word. Well, yes it <I>is</I> the word, but it's not strong enough.
<P>
I'll be around. Not making videos, maybe not even blogging very much, but I'm not gone, I'm just... busy. Sorry!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Criticism of Islam is not racism</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-19a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
If anyone has ever criticised Islam, chances are they will at some point be called racist. But...


Is Islam a race? No.

If Islam allows people of all races into it, then it is not a race and I cannot be racist.

If Islam did not allow people of al... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
If anyone has ever criticised Islam, chances are they will at some point be called racist. But...
<P>
<UL>
<LI>Is Islam a race? No.
<P>
<LI>If Islam allows people of all races into it, then it is not a race and I cannot be racist.
<P>
<LI>If Islam did not allow people of all races in to join it then Islam itself would be racist.
</UL>
<P>
So how can I be a racist for criticising Islam? Answer: race and religion are not connected. At all. It's not really all that difficult to understand... is it?


 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>God! You wanker!</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-18a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
God, you wanker. You fucking idiot. You twat. You've fucked up the whole world with your stupid, stupid fucking religion. If nobody believed in you we'd all be happily going along thinking, "This is all there is so we'd better make the most of it," ... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
God, you wanker. You fucking idiot. You twat. You've fucked up the whole world with your stupid, <I>stupid</I> fucking religion. If nobody believed in you we'd all be happily going along thinking, "This is all there is so we'd better make the most of it," and, "Fuck me, we've got one planet and if we don't look after it we're in deep shit." But no. No. You had to be there didn't you. Or make that 'you had to make people <I>think</I> you're there'. Even though you're not there, but if you were... well, how fucked up does it have to get for you to just shout down and say to us all, "Look, you little human bastards, <I>this</I> is how I want to be worshipped," and then send down a list of all the things we have to do to make you happy, so that we <I>all</I> know what the crack is, we <I>all</I> have the same religion and we're not all fighting with the ones who believe in different ways.
<P>
Because it's like this isn't it: there's this book, and apparently you put it into people's heads, so they wrote it down and we're all supposed to believe it. Nope. No can do. For one thing it's too fucking long, for another it's too fucking weird, and for a third thing it's so out of date it would be illegal to sell it if it was food and it would probably poison everyone. Which, by sheer coincidence (not) is exactly what the book does. No fucker understands it. No, let's be more specific. Everyone who reads it understands it in a different way from everyone else. So what's the point? Are you proud of that, God? Are you proud of writing a book which isn't even intelligible to the people who <I>want</I> to believe it?
<P>
Let's do a comparison: the people who write the manuals for putting together a Boeing 747 are pretty specific. If they missed something out or they were a bit vague, or worse still if something could be interpreted in two or more ways, the whole flying hunk of metal would probably come crashing down or maybe never even get up in the air in the first place. There are some seriously accurate specifications in the tech manuals for a commercial airliner. Fuck, even Ikea do instruction manuals well enough so that most people can put up their weird hippy bedroom furniture without turning it into a pile of sticks and an amateur modern art project. But the Bible? Vague. <I>Fucking</I> vague. Jeebus even admits that he <I>wants</I> to be vague by talking in parables so that most people are confused and haven't got a fucking clue what he's jabbering on about. Why? Who knows?
<P>
If there was no Bible we'd be cool. We'd all be pagans again, believing in <U>all</U> the gods all the time, a bit like the Hindus, maybe a bit like the Greeks and Romans and whoever - before the intolerant monotheist motherfuckers came along the Romans were cool. "Hey, whatever religion you want, whatever gods you have, that's okay, so long as you respect everyone else's gods we'll respect yours." That's what it was like, but the Christians weren't having any of it. Not a bit of it. Fuck that say the Jesus freaks, it's the one God and nobody else's and we're not respecting your religion because that's what we're like - intolerant tossers who just want it our way and can't stand seeing you have a good time.
<P>
And you wonder why the Christians were persecuted? Not for them the 'live and let live', and where the fuck is 'turn the other cheek' when it comes to letting other people have their own set of beliefs? "Sorry, when we get into power you're <I>all</I> fucked," say the Christians (except they probably didn't use the bad words, and it was probably all in Latin, or maybe Greek). Soon as they're in, pagan religions get persecuted and wiped out. <I>Bastards</I>.
<P>
So God, back to you. You sent down this book, apparently, and not just one book, there were 66 of em, and they all got smushed together and now people think it's the word of God. The <I>confusing</I> word of God. If it was supposed to be a manual so that people could live better lives, why does it need thousands and thousands of preachers and philosophers to make sense of it all? Shouldn't it be easy? Shouldn't we just be able to open it and work out what to do without someone else interpreting it for us?
<P>
"I'm a bit anxious, what do I do, God." Ooo, let's turn to Psalm 46 (says my Gideon Bible stolen from a hotel). I've literally picked this out at random - see the footnote which indicates my current mental state, so this is probably typical of the 'help' you'll find elsewhere. Now you'd think that Psalm 46 would give me some advice about my anxiety. Sort of like Dr Phil, but much more emphasis on the white beard, flowing robes and ability to create/destroy universes at will. So what do we get? Here it is, God's everlasting wisdom (aka the usual Bible bollocks):

<OL>
<LI>God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.
<LI>Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea;
<LI>Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. Selah.
<LI>There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High.
<LI>God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early.
<LI>The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted.
<LI>The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.
<LI>Come, behold the works of the LORD, what desolations he hath made in the earth.
<LI>He maketh wars to cease unto the end of the earth; he breaketh the bow, and cutteth the spear in sunder; he burneth the chariot in the fire.
<LI>Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.
<LI>The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.
</OL>
<P>

WHAT. THE. FUCK?
<P>
Look, God, I'm fucking anxious. I have some serious debts and the credit crunch means I'm about to lose my house. What am I going to do? Bible says: "<I>There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High.</I>" Wah?! What use is that? What use to me is any of this crap, at all, <I>ever</I>?
<P>
Worse than that is the fact that the same book means different things to different people, purely because it means nothing. Literally <I>nothing</I>. So we're all arguing, we're all disagreeing, we're all responding and reacting in different ways, because the book, which is supposed to be inspired by God, is saying <I>fuck all</I> so that the people reading it have to make up some shit and get a handle on their own lives. Which of course they could just as easily do if they didn't even have the Bible in the first place.
<P>
It's not even the only book. Fuck me, God, you gave a different book to a different set of people! Dodgy. Very dodgy. Well okay, this book has some detail, I'll give you that. The Qur'an and and hadith even explain which hand to wipe your arse with after a shit, and tell you all about spooky spirits called genies (I'll add links when the drink wears off... not, but for now, trust me, Islam really does have rules for all that). So you'd think that all these detailed instructions would be so easy to follow that everyone would say, "Hmm, okay, well that's God's word then, we'll all do it." Are you fucking crazy? Who in their right minds is going to follow that bullshit when it's so strict, so controlling, and so totally alien to the way of life you could have if you followed (however loosely) the stuff in the Bible? I mean, no drink? No bacon? No thanks! And those are just small things.
<P>
If God was up there, you'd seriously think he would sort this one out. Not all of these different ways of living can be the right ones, surely. It's impossible - they are to a lesser or greater extent mutually exclusive. Of course they can't all be right, but they can all be wrong, which means one of two things:
<OL>
<LI>There is no God.
<P>
<LI>God exists but he's loving the trouble he's caused by not making it all any clearer. God is a wanker.
</OL>
<P>
I'll go for option one any day, but if you believe in God (you idiot) you have to see the sense in option two. Any God who sets up a system like this just wants it to fail, <I>wants</I> to see people running around killing each other because they believe different things, because they can't agree on what the true religion is and what everyone should do. They all <I>think</I> they know, but they can't all be right, so they kick seven shades of shit, blood and bile out of each other, among other things.
<P>
They're all wrong. And if they're not, then I'm telling him straight: God, you're a wanker. So fuck off and leave us alone. At least until you decide to sort things out. And this time... no watery, flood-based genocides please, okay?
<hr size=1>
<B>Footnote:</B><BR>
Written under the influence of <U>massive</U> quantities of neat whisky (not the good stuff, either), which is all the more impressive because I managed to put in the HTML codes manually and upload it to the right place with my FTP software. I am the dog's bollocks of all atheist web designers, I kid you not :o) And now I have the munchies...
<P>

<div align=center style="margin:0 0 5px 0";>
<object width="480" height="376">
  <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7JYIJPjpCFc"></param>
  <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
  <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7JYIJPjpCFc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="376"></embed>
</object>
<BR><B>So you thought <I>alcohol</I> made you say and do stupid things?</B>
</div>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Proving God the hard way</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-11a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Take a look at the following list, which shows just a small selection of the methods used by religious people to 'prove' that their God exists:

Cosmological argument
Teleological argument
Ontological argument
Anthropic argument
Moral argument
Trans... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Take a look at the following list, which shows just a small selection of the methods used by religious people to 'prove' that their God exists:
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument">Cosmological argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleological_argument">Teleological argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument">Ontological argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle">Anthropic argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_morality">Moral argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_argument_for_the_existence_of_God">Transcendental argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness_argument">Witness argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_common_consent">Majority argument</A>
<LI><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_a_Proper_Basis">Argument from a Proper Basis</A>
</UL>

There are many, many more, and I recommend taking a look at the <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God#Arguments_for_the_existence_of_God"><B>Existence of God</B></A> article at Wikipedia, which is a good starting point. Many of these 'proofs' are incredibly detailed, using extremely complex philosophical arguments and logical acrobatics to make their case. Theists go to enormous lengths to prove that God exists - some of the greatest minds of the last 2000 years and more have taken up this challenge and set out their ideas as to how God must exist because of their particular proof.
<P>
Isn't this a little odd?
<P>
Surely the fact that so many great (and not so great) philosophers have tackled this problem speaks volumes about the truth of the statement 'God exists'. If God exists, why would anyone actually <I>need</I> to go to so much trouble trying to prove it? Take a look at any of the 'proofs' in the list - they all link to quite lengthy articles, quoting such lofty minds as Plato, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas... these are no two-bit Christians making YouTube videos, they are serious intellectual heavyweights whose writings have stood the test of time - after all, their arguments are still quoted today, so they obviously knew what they were talking about. And yet they each had to put in huge efforts to make sure their argument of choice would be totally water-tight, would have no room for doubt, contain no flaws of logic, so that there  would be no way to refute their case.
<P>
The complexity of these arguments suggests two things to me:
<OL>
<LI>The more difficult it is to prove that God exists, the more unlikely it is that God does actually exist. (Although note that this is not at all proof that God does <I>not</I> exist.)
<P>
<LI>More importantly, it seems to show a lack of faith. Who exactly are these people trying to convince? To re-work a common saying, 'Methinks the philosopher doth protest too much' - if God is so obvious, why is it so difficult to prove his existence? And if his existence isn't so obvious... why not?
</OL>

God, if he existed, would be the most important 'thing' ever, bar none. That much is plain. If he exists, would there be any doubt at all about his existence? Would there be any need for teleological, ontological or anthropic arguments to be formulated? Moreover, these arguments, being highly complex in some cases, are not so easy to understand - many people are not able to grasp the finer details of Aquinas' great theological treatises, for example. You'd think that something as big as God would need to be proven beyond doubt to us 'lesser mortals', those who don't want to study theology for years in order to prove God's existence.
<P>
If God existed, wouldn't he just be, well... obvious? You'd think that someone who apparently wants us to believe in him, and who will punish us if we don't, would not require the efforts of history's greatest theological minds to convince us that he is actually there. Surely something a little simpler would be enough to provide this proof?
<P>
Someone once asked me the following question. I had taken great pains to dismantle all his so-called 'proofs' and 'evidence' for the existence of God, and finally he became exasperated and asked:
<blockquote>
If there was some evidence which could be put in front of you which would convince you of the existence of God, what would it be?
</blockquote>

My answer was just a single word:
<blockquote>
God.
</blockquote>

This can all be distilled very neatly into something which I proudly present to the world as (wait for it):

<OL>
<LH><B>The argument from potato</B><P>
<LI>I have a potato in my hand.
<LI>I can prove to you that I have a potato in my hand.
<LI>Here it is.
</OL>

When someone can bring God forward and put him where I, and indeed everyone else in the world, can see him, only then will we have a valid proof of God's existence. If you're out there, God, just come out of hiding - it would save us all a whole lot of time and trouble, believe me.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Let the punishment fit the crime</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-06c</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Consider this to be a little follow-on from my previous blog, Who does it harm?

So, Christians, let's discuss crime and let's see how you feel how people should be dealt with when they commit various crimes:


Murder - Arrested and charged? Agreed.... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Consider this to be a little follow-on from my previous blog, <A HREF="http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-06b"><B>Who does it harm?</B></A>
<P>
So, Christians, let's discuss crime and let's see how you feel how people should be dealt with when they commit various crimes:
<P>
<OL>
<LI><B>Murder</B> - Arrested and charged? Agreed.
<P>
<LI><B>Theft</B> - Arrested and charged? Agreed.
<P>
<LI><B>Child Abuse</B> - Arrested and charged? Agreed.
<P>
<LI><B>Homosexuality</B> - Arrested and charged?
</OL>

<P>
If you said 'agreed' to the last one, just check for a moment the laws of your country. Homosexuality is legal in all the western democracies I can think of, and that's a lot of countries. So in your country, the country in which you live and work and, if you're a Christian, in which you pray, there is no penalty at all for the so-called (at least by Christians) 'crime' of homosexuality.
<P>
Why is that? Might it be because the majority of societies have no problem at all with homosexuality? Could be, could be. But surely in the Bible God specifically calls homosexuality an abomination:

<blockquote>
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.<BR>
<I>Leviticus 18:22</I>
<P>
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.<BR>
<I>Leviticus 20:13</I>
</blockquote>

Whereas he doesn't mention child abuse <I>at all</I> and yet we all know that's a crime.
<P>
So we have these things:
<UL>
<LI>God sets out rules defining what he thinks are crimes and we ignore them
<LI>We know certain things are crimes, even though God never said they are
<LI>Coveting your neighbour's wife is apparently far worse than raping her (coveting is in the 10 Commandments, rape is not)
<LI>This is all arbitrary and modern laws do not reflect the Bible in any way at all
<LI>This is because the legal system is in no way related to Christianity
<LI>...because Christianity makes no sense
</UL>

And yet despite this, despite the fact that, in law, 'gay is okay', we still have gay-bashing Christians. Go figure. However my point is this: if homosexuality is an abomination against God (and that would be a really bad thing, right?), why is it legal? And why are the vast majority of Christians (rather than the usual few fundie fucktards) not voting for it to be outlawed? If Christians really do believe that homosexuality is wrong, why is it not banned in every country where Christians are in a majority? Why no bills passing through the UK Parliament or the US Senate?
<P>
The answer (and again I refer you to my previous blog) is this: homosexuality hurts no-one. When someone steals, there is a victim. When someone is murdered, there is a victim. When someone has gay sex... there is NO victim.
<P>
No victim = no crime. So despite what the fundamentalists may lead you to believe, the majority of Christians seem to be okay with homosexuality <I>not</I> being a crime. This would be encouraging, but for the extremely vocal minority who whip up the homophobia into a creamy, frothy, hateful frenzy. And let's not forget Muslims, who nearly ALL hate gays - in ALL Muslims countries homosexuality really is illegal.
<P>
It seems we all have more work to do.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Who does it harm?</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-06b</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Religion puts great store in the idea that certain actions are sinful or immoral. Much on this list of 'bad things' is beyond dispute: murder, stealing, child abuse are without question all things which are wrong. Why are they wrong? Because they ca... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Religion puts great store in the idea that certain actions are sinful or immoral. Much on this list of 'bad things' is beyond dispute: murder, stealing, child abuse are without question all things which are wrong. Why are they wrong? Because they cause harm to other people. Furthermore, <I>only</I> because they cause harm to others are they wrong. You could, for example, 'kill' a life-like plastic doll and it would harm no-one. You could 'steal' a piec of driftwood floating on the sea, and (because it has no owner) there would be no harm done. Neither of these things is wrong because nothing else, nobody else, is hurt by these actions, or has in any way a reduced quality of life because of them. When your actions interfere with the life of another person in a negative way is when something starts to become 'wrong'.
<P>
In essence, this is simply an extension of the so-called 'golden rule', also known as the 'ethic of reciprocity':

<blockquote>
Treat others as you would like to be treated
</blockquote>

In other words, if you'd rather something didn't happen to you, don't to it to someone else. Not many people like a punch in the mouth, so punching someone in the mouth is considered to be wrong. In most cases it's simple common sense.
<P>
Of course Christians will tell you that this is morality, that it comes from the Bible, that God laid down these laws, and even if you're an atheist you're living by God's rules... etc, etc. The trouble is, religions have longer lists of wrongdoings, <I>much</I> longer lists, containing actions which, though they hurt absolutely no-one, are still considered to be wrong. I'm going to look at just a few of these, examining why religion says they are 'a bad thing' and why I consider them to be <I>not</I> a bad thing.
<P>
<B>Homosexuality</B><BR>
Homosexuality is condemned by pretty much the majority of the active Christian and Muslim world. Why? Because, they say, it is an abomination, it goes against the teachings of their respective holy books, and, the clincher, 'because God says it's wrong'. However saying that something is wrong because 'God says so' does not in any way explain <I>why</I> homosexuality is wrong. Who does it harm?
<P>
Are the people in a gay relationship harmed? No. They are happy to be in that relationship in exactly the same way that two people of the opposite sex would be happy to be in their relationship. Their love for each other is as strong as that which exists in any heterosexual coupling. If they fall out of love, they separate, as do hetero couples. That's just relationships for you - morality is not at all in the equation because if it was then it would be wrong for people of the opposite sex to get together just in case they risked hurting each other's feelings at some point.
<P>
Does the coming together of two people as a homosexual couple harm anyone else? Again, no. Anti-gay protestors don't like seeing gay couples together, and may find it offensive, but is that hurting them? Their own mental barriers to such actions mean that they themselves are making this imaginary mental 'harm' for themselves. By all means, accept that this is something you yourself would prefer not to do, but leave it at that. I personally would prefer not to watch cricket, ever, under any circumstances - I can't see why people enjoy it or what purpose it serves - but people want to do it, and it doesn't affect my life in any way. Not in any way. So where's the harm?
<P>
Children. Ah yes, gay people can't have children. So? Neither can old people. Old people get together all the time and <I>they</I> can't have children either. Is that wrinkly sex immoral too? Of course not, because it's not hurting anyone. The Christian position is that God made us to have children, but is not having children (and remember, some people <I>choose</I> not to do so) hurting anyone? Of course not. Who is hurt when a child is not born?
<P>
It's just ridiculous to say that homosexuality is wrong. It harms nobody. It harms nothing. Indeed it brings great satisfaction to the happy same-sex couples who ignore the religious slurs and just get on with their lives - <I>hurting nobody</I>.
<P>
<B>Sex before marriage</B><BR>
Sex before marriage hurts no-one, simply because sex before marriage is exactly the same as sex <I>within</I> marriage. The mechanics are the same - things go up and in, and it's all over until the next time. Good or bad, sex is sex. Why is it considered wrong by religions? Again, it's because 'God said so'. But who does it harm?
<P>
It doesn't harm the people involved. They want to do it, so they do it. It's a choice they make. Remember the 'treat others as you would like to be treated' ethic? Think of it like this: 'have sex with someone if you want them to have sex with you'. Harm? None. Where only one side wants the sex, of course that's different, but then the situation is 'would you want someone to force you to have sex?'. Of course the answer is no, so there is harm involved. In that case it becomes wrong.
<P>
If sex is sex, why does marriage have to be involved? Probably because the preachers of religion want to enforce you to behave in a way they deem acceptable. After all, marriage shows a good level of commitment to a relationship doesn't it? But does not being in a long-term relationship but still having sex cause harm? How can it if both parties are agreeable to the situation? You can go bowling before marriage, so why should sex be any different? Where's the harm? I don't see it.
<P>
<B>Masturbation</B><BR>
See the pattern of religious 'crimes' developing here? Most of the taboos are based around sex. Masturbation is actually the least dangerous sexual activity you can undertake - nobody else is around (usually) so nobody can even see what you're doing. How could jacking off ever be seen as immoral? Who else is harmed? Nobody.
<P>
<B>Contraception</B><BR>
Not all religions outlaw contraception, but the big one does - the Roman Catholics are so against contraception they will mobilise at a moment's notice if it appears that any attempt is made to distribute condoms where they don't want them to go. However, where they are 'not wanted' by the Catholic Church is often where they would do the most good. One of the world's greatest scandals is that at a time when huge areas of Africa are seeing the spread of HIV/AIDS, the Pope still continues to reject the distribution of contraception for the people of these countries, simply because 'God says so'. God, apparently, would rather have millions of people die of a terrible disease if it means that a man's penis can enter a woman's vagina without protection against infection.
<P>
Who is harmed when contraception is used? Not the man. Not the woman. The religious will say 'it stops the creation of a life', but that implies that every sperm and every egg is useful. It isn't. Even if you don't masturbate, billions of sperm live and die inside and outside a man in his lifetime. Women have their periods - more 'potential life' is gone. So manual prevention of pregnancy is in no way any different from the natural order - people are simply choosing not to create a life (which harms no-one) <I>and</I>, as a beneficial by-product, are protecting themselves from the risk of infection from sexually transmitted diseases. Where is the harm in using contraception? There is none. On the contrary, the benefits are abundantly obvious.
<P>

<div align=center style="margin:0 0 5px 0";>
<object width="480" height="376">
  <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/s-DxovgI7NI"></param>
  <param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
  <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/s-DxovgI7NI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="376"></embed>
</object>
<BR><B>Okay, I couldn't resist including this video</B>
</div>
<P>
<B>Thought crimes</B><BR>
Here's where it gets silly. Here's where we go into Orwellian 'Big Brother' territory. Christians, Muslims, and some other religions, think that certain <I>thoughts</I> are wrong. If you think them, if you allow them to so much as cross your mind, you are committing a sin, an immoral act, something for which you must pray to be forgiven.
<P>
One of the Bible's Ten Commandments tells you not to covet your neighbour's house, wife, slave, ox, donkey, or anything else that belongs to your them. To covet is 'to wish for longingly'. In other words, if you see that your neighbour has a better house than you, it's immoral to think 'I wish I could have that house'. Just thinking something is wrong? Again, the acid test: how does thinking that thought hurt anyone? In fact how does thinking <I>any</I> thought hurt anyone?
<P>
Let's go further. I'm essentially saying that no thought is bad because, obviously, thoughts cannot affect the lives of others. So if someone dreams about killing, or (let's go to extremes to make this point) if someone thinks about how nice it would be to have sex with a child, is the act of <I>thinking</I> these thoughts immoral.
<P>
I say no.
<P>
And I say no because the act of <I>thinking</I> is in no way the same as the act of <I>doing</I>. Yes, if you think about murder and then go on to kill someone, that would be wrong. But it would be the act of murder, not the initial thought which was wrong. I have at times entertained thoughts of killing a particularly hateful person, but those thoughts inflicted no pain, no suffering, no death, on that person. He did not even know when or where those thoughts came into my head. He <I>is</I> now dead (from natural causes!) and yes, I am glad he's dead, the evil son-of-a-bitch! Is it wrong for me to think that? No. Who is harmed? Thoughts do not harm anyone. Only actions harm people. Thoughts are never, and I really do mean <I>never</I> harmful to others.
<P>
<B>Self-harm</B><BR>
Is harming yourself wrong? Is suicide, the ultimate self-harm, wrong? That's a tricky one because by hurting or killing yourself you may of course cause emotional distress to those around you - friends, family or loved ones. But your life is your own, your body is your own, so ultimately you should be able to do with it whatever you wished. Ultimately, it is not for anyone else to decide what you should or should not do with your own body. I still maintain that if you hurt someone, it would be wrong, but if you hurt no-one it cannot be wrong.
<P>
<B>Assisted suicide (euthanasia)</B><BR>
Helping someone else to die when they themselves have asked for your assistance, usually because they are in a weakened state and cannot do it themselves, is not wrong. Again, let's go back to the golden rule: 'treat others as you would like to be treated'. You may not want someone to kill you, but then that is not the situation in which the other person finds themselves. That person, for whatever reason, and it's usually because they have some incurable disease causing them a great deal of pain and suffering, is asking you to help put an end to their suffering. They are not in any way saying 'kill someone who does not want to be killed'.
<P>
Is there harm? Harm in the sense that you will be actively helping someone to die? Yes. But the alternative is this: if the person is not allowed to die, the harm may be many times greater, the pain far, far worse. Would you condemn someone to endless suffering, or release them from their pain with a quick end to their life? In this case, I personally would assist someone who wanted to die. Unlike the other examples I've dealt with, it would not be a case of 'is there harm in doing this?'. Instead the question to ask is 'is there harm in <I>not</I> doing this?
<P>
But if the person is suffering terribly and does <I>not</I> ask for help to die, should you then use the justification of 'is there harm in not doing this?'. Absolutely not. The only judge of what is right and wrong with respect to the ending of someone's life, at least if they still have the mental capacity to make a decision, lies with the person whose life it is. If a person is suffering but does not want to die, they have made that choice and it should not be denied them.
<P>
There are other possibilities, such as when someone leaves specific instructions to end their suffering if they become unable to make the decision for themselves, but that still falls under the heading of 'a person must be able to choose what to do with their own life'.
<P>
To me, euthanasia is almost the same as a situation where you have a diseased organ or limb, and to leave it attached would cause more harm than good. In this case you would remove it, so as to prevent further suffering. The difference is that with euthanasia you are removing <I>every</I> limb and organ from the equation, ending the suffering in the only way possibly, by ending the life of the sufferer.
<P>
<hr size=1 width=70%>
<P>
To wrap this up, I'll end by saying that it's my opinion that morals are, in most cases, very straightforward things to determine. In fact, rather than the Christian Bible, you might easily take every single moral decision you make by following one of the basic teaching of another religion:

<blockquote>
An it harm none, do what ye will
</blockquote>

This is the <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiccan_Rede"><B>Wiccan Rede</B></A>, and although in my opinion Wicca itself is a weird 20th century made-up religion consisting of bunch of new-age mumbo-jumbo, that single line really encapsulates everything I am trying to espouse in this article. Another (less archaic) way of saying it would be 'do what you will, so long as it harms none'. Although there are some grey areas, such as the conflict caused by removing someone's suffering by ending their life, but one thing living by this ethic does not do is to treat countless thoughts or actions, which are in no way harmful to anyone, as crimes.
<P>
Thinking in this way encapsulates both the idea that some morals are relative (actions may or may not be wrong, depending on the situation) <I>and</I> that morals may be absolute (applying in all cases). Christians often cite the example of Nazi Germany: if morals are relative, and change according to the culture, politics and social mores of the time, then the extermination of the Jews would be 'right' and therefore moral, in the eyes of the Nazis. But killing Jews harms Jews. What simpler way can there be to explain how wrong the Holocaust was?
<P>
To take a different example, is sex outside marriage always okay, given that I've already said that you don't need to be married to have sex? The answer is: no. If you have extra-marital sex with a third party when you are <I>already</I> in a relationship, knowing that your partner would not, if they knew about it, be accepting of it, is wrong. Why? Because finding out about it would cause emotional harm to your partner. What if they didn't find out about it? Well, that then becomes an issue of conscience - are you willing to take the risk? Or perhaps it goes back to the golden rule - don't screw around if you'd rather your own partner wasn't also screwing around.
<P>
I'm starting to pick at the edges of my own certainties and unravel a few of what I thought were tightly-constructed arguments, so that, I'm afraid, is where I'm going to leave it!


<hr size=1>
<B>Abortion - Not discussed here</B><BR>
This is perhaps one of the toughest subjects for which anyone can make a case, either for or against. I need to address this in more detail, because adding it into the above-described mix of actions which are, to me at least, far more clear-cut, would be to give the subject significantly less weight than it deserves. Abortion, to many, is the <I>unnecessary</I>, and thereby immoral, ending of a life, and to some is described as nothing less than murder. Needless to say, I do not agree with either position.
<P>
If by saying that I would rather not discuss abortion here that sounds like a cop-out, it probably is. I have wanted to write down something about this subject for a long time, but it's difficult for me to set out reasons and justifications for my position. Which is? Well, I am 100% supportive of anyone who elects to have an abortion.
<P>
I promise I'll come back to this.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Why there are no aleprechaunists. At all, at all.</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-06a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Why are there atheists? Saying you're an atheist merely tells people you don't believe in any god or gods. So why say it at all? And why, somebody asked today, are there no aleprechaunists, fiercely claiming that leprechauns do not exist?

Here's wh... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Why are there atheists? Saying you're an atheist merely tells people you don't believe in any god or gods. So why say it at all? And why, somebody asked today, are there no aleprechaunists, fiercely claiming that leprechauns do not exist?
<P>
Here's why, in a comment I just posted in response to a video by someone asking exactly that kind of question:

<blockquote>
If people believed in leprechauns and went around trying to convert you to their ridiculous deity God O'Murphy, ostracised you if you didn't believe in the pot of gold, and wanted to put giant pictures of shamrocks in schools and courthouses, I guarantee you there would be aleprechaunists. As nobody believes in leprechauns, you'll instead find atheists, speaking out when your equally silly beliefs in God contradict and contend with their lives and notion of what is real.
</blockquote>

Sometimes YouTube's 500-character limit is just about enough to say all you need to say.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Religious laws: good for men, bad for women</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-05a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
Just a small example of what happens when you allow religious groups to take charge of a country's legal system:


Turkish women attack clothing law

About 70 Turkish women have protested in Istanbul after a court found a woman guilty of exhibitioni... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Just a small example of what happens when you allow religious groups to take charge of a country's legal system:

<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7491484.stm"><B>Turkish women attack clothing law</B></A>
<P>
About 70 Turkish women have protested in Istanbul after a court found a woman guilty of exhibitionism for fishing in what was termed "improper clothing".
<P>
Turkish newspapers quote court documents as saying she was wearing a lightweight outfit like a nightdress, which blew up in the wind.
<P>
Last week a judge upheld the men's complaints.
<P>
The AK Party - which is led by devout Muslims - has been in power since 2002. Some are concerned Turkey is becoming more conservative under its rule.
</blockquote>

<P>
Perhaps the most telling part of the story is this:

<blockquote>
Men who groped a woman on Taksim Square last New Year's Eve were fined 57 lira ($45, £23).
<P>
The fisherwoman in a flimsy dress was given a five-month suspended prison sentence for exhibitionism.
</blockquote>

Man committing sexual assault: $45
<P>
Woman wearing a dress on a windy day: five-month suspended prison sentence
<P>
Muslim discrimination against women: priceless
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>The fourth of July means nothing</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-04a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
It's the fourth of July. So what? I'm British and I don't give a flying fuck what the date is, mainly because it has no significance here whatsoever. What would I like to celebrate today? Being part of England, Britain and Europe, that's what! Our I... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
It's the fourth of July. So what? I'm British and I don't give a flying fuck what the date is, mainly because it has no significance here whatsoever. What would I like to celebrate today? Being part of England, Britain and Europe, that's what! Our Independence Day is... oh, that's right, we don't have one because we were the ones in charge and everyone else became independent of <I>us</I>! Meanwhile, we have to wait until the fifth of November to set off our fireworks... and burn effigies of a Catholic traitor on our bonfires! Woohoo! God save the Queen!
 ]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>




<item>
<title>Love the sinner, but not if he's gay</title>
<link>http://www.gisburne.com/blog/2008-07-03a</link>

<description><![CDATA[ 
You want some hate? I'll show you hate: Christian attitudes to homosexuality. Look no further, because if you want evidence of real intolerance, serious discrimination, undeniable hatred for living, breathing people just going about their lives in t... ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
You want some hate? I'll show you hate: Christian attitudes to homosexuality. Look no further, because if you want evidence of real intolerance, serious discrimination, undeniable hatred for living, breathing people just going about their lives in their own way, you'll find it among those Christians who would do anything, <I>anything</I> to rid the world of homosexuality.
<P>
So what brought this up today? After all, I've made a few videos about the subject, and it's no secret that this is one religious prejudice which raises my anger to boiling point. What's new? Well, this article is new:


<blockquote>
<A HREF="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Business/Default.aspx?id=164294"><B>AFA calls for McDonald's boycott</B></A><BR>
The founder of the American Family Association (AFA) says the McDonald's Corporation's refusal to be neutral in the cultural war over homosexuality has resulted in their declaration of a boycott against the popular fast-food chain.
<P>
AFA founder Don Wildmon says they went to McDonald's after learning several months ago that the company had joined the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce. And following a $20,000 donation to that group, one of McDonald's executives was placed on the Chamber's board of directors.
<P>
"We contacted McDonald's and showed them what they were doing -- that is, helping to support the homosexual agenda," explains Wildmon. "...[O]ne of the primary purposes of the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce is to promote homosexual marriage."
<P>
After meeting with Wildmon, the corporation refused to withdraw their support for the Chamber. "...In fact, McDonald's strongly told us that they are reaffirming their commitment to -- they called it -- 'diversity,'" he continues.
<P>
Wildmon says that reaffirmation means throwing the corporation's full weight into the cultural battle on the side of homosexuality -- which is why AFA is calling for consumers not to help McDonald's do it with their dollars.
</blockquote>

Yes, for once I am proud to say that I stand shoulder to shoulder with that great American belly-expanding institute, McDonald's. But what really gets me angry is the comments section, the target audience for this news story - the Christians who are showing their true feelings. Take a look at the page for the full view, but first a few choice quotes from some of the people who supposedly 'hate the sin but love the sinner':
<UL>
<LI>Let's all let the sodomite's support McDonald's. They say they are 10% of the population. The last I heard they were 2% of the population. Then we can watch McDonald's go under. The next place we have to boycott because of sodomite support would be shaking in their boots.
<P>
<LI>Most of us already quit McDonalds when we heard about their perversion push. It is families with children that made them what they are today so we can also take them down. I doubt many homos will continue eating there if there are no children to "convert" or molest. I say let the fruits have it - the food is horrible and why buy nasty food when you can buy good food next door that you can actually take your children inside the place! NO to the perverts!
<P>
<LI>Homosexuality is a choice to follow a deviant sexual lifestyle... Fortunately, there are plenty of clinics that successfully help people who want to get rid of same-sex attraction. It is not discrimination to tell the truth to confused people. Normal people seek other normals and confused people think they're suffering discrimination when all that is happening is the law of nature seeking after its own. Homosexuals need therapy, not tolerance. And plenty of prayer. . .
<P>
<LI>If McDonalds will support a racist agenda, it only figures it will support a homosexual one as well.<BR>
<I>Note: incredibly, this idiot is condemning one prejudice (racism) while supporting another (hatred of homosexuality), probably without a second thought</I>
<P>
<LI>Colonel Sanders was a Christian man and gave God the glory for leading him to found his business. He will be getting all of my business from now on.<BR>
<I>Note: Okay, that one is funny! Kill yourself with Christian chicken instead of gay beef!</I>
<P>
<LI>Most people I know do not support discrimination against homosexuals nor more than we would a person with cancer or an alcoholic. All three have a sickness and should be prayed for. What I do object to is the idea that the pro homosexual agenda wants society to "accept" their behavior as morally ok and to silence those of us who do not agree.<BR>
<I>Note: So, you don't want to discriminate against them but you object to anything which would allow them to be accepted into society? Riiiiight...</I>
<P>
<LI>I started boycotting McDonald's about a month ago, the moment I heard about their support of the homosexual lifestyle. This boycott is about denying McDonald's my money to spend on deviant behavior.
<P>
<LI>No to McDonalds. No to diversity. No to political correctness.
</UL>

If that's love, I wouldn't like to see what happens if they started to get mildly annoyed with someone. Let's end with a voice of reason, again from the comments:

<UL>
<LI>So.. We will continue to support McDonald's when they lure children with their advertising to tran